Elections: primaries.
Summary
Existing provisions of the California Constitution require the Legislature to provide for primary elections for partisan offices, including an open presidential primary election, as specified. The California Constitution also provides that all judicial, school, county, and city offices are nonpartisan offices, and a political party or party central committee is prohibited from endorsing, supporting, or opposing a candidate for these offices. This measure would permit a voter, at the time of registration, to choose whether or not to disclose a party preference. This measure would also provide that a voter may vote for the candidate of his or her choosing in the primary election, regardless of his or her disclosure or non-disclosure of party preference. This measure would provide for a "voter-nominated primary election" for each state elective office and congressional office in California, in which a voter may vote at the primary election for any candidate for congressional or state elective office without regard to the political party preference disclosed by either the candidate or the voter. The 2 candidates receiving the 2 highest vote totals for each office at a primary election, regardless of party preference, would then compete for the office at the ensuing general election. The measure would further provide that a candidate for a congressional or state elective office generally may choose whether to have his or her political party preference indicated upon the ballot for that office in the manner to be provided by statute. This measure would not change existing law as it relates to presidential primaries. Because this bill would change the duties of local elections officials, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. This bill would provide that it would become operative only if SCA 4 is approved by the voters.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2008
Committee Review
Senate Passage
Feb 2009
Assembly Passage
Feb 2009
Signed into Law
Feb 2009
Introduced Dec 1, 2008
Signed Feb 20, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Feb 19, 2009 · Assembly Feb 19, 2009
How they voted
25–9
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Feb 19, 2009
D
Democratic22
90% Yea
R
Republican13
53% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
2
Committee
0
Feb 20, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Feb 19, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-9-1)
senate
Dec 1, 2008
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Abel Maldonado
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 6
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 6. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline