Hetch Hetchy Water and Power: renewable generation.
Summary
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, as defined. Existing law authorizes the City and County of San Francisco to elect to designate specific photovoltaic electricity generation facilities meeting specified conditions as Hetch Hetchy Water and Power (HHWP) at-site solar generation, as defined, and HHWP remote solar generation, as defined. Existing law requires that upon election and the filing and acceptance of an advice letter with the commission establishing rates, Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) is required on a monthly basis, to credit the City and County of San Francisco for certain electricity generated and delivered to the electric grid by HHWP at-site solar generation in accordance with specified rate criteria. Existing law additionally authorizes the City and County of San Francisco to elect to designate specific photovoltaic electricity generation facilities as HHWP remote solar generation to supply electricity to qualifying remote load by designating those facilities to be served by HHWP remote solar generation. Existing law requires that PG&E accept any electricity exported to the grid by HHWP remote solar generation, up to the amount of electricity contemporaneously being used by the qualifying remote load, and treat the electricity accepted as behind the meter generation that offsets the electrical usage of qualifying remote load. Existing law requires that where the separate or remote sites are outside the City and County of San Francisco, they be located within 20 miles of the City and County of San Francisco or within 20 miles of an HHWP remote solar generation facility. This bill would authorize the City and County of San Francisco to elect to designate specific renewable electricity generation facilities, as defined, as HHWP at-site renewable generation and HHWP remote renewable generation. The bill would authorize the City and County of San Francisco to elect to designate specific renewable electricity generation facilities or a portion of specific renewable electricity generation facilities as HHWP remote renewable generation to supply electricity to qualifying remote load by designating those facilities to be served by HHWP remote renewable generation. The bill would require that PG&E accept any electricity exported to the grid by HHWP remote renewable generation, up to the amount of electricity being used during the corresponding time period by the qualifying remote load, and to treat the electricity accepted as behind the meter generation that offsets the electrical usage of qualifying remote load. The bill would declare that, due to the special circumstances applicable only to HHWP renewable generation facilities, a general statute cannot be made applicable within the meaning of Section 16 of Article IV of the California Constitution, and the enactment of a special statute is therefore necessary.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate May 26, 2009 · Assembly Sep 1, 2009
How they voted
25–13
Passed
Total votes 38
May 26, 2009
D
Democratic24
95% Yea
R
Republican14
85% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
9
Committee
5
Amendments
3
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Sep 8, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 30. Noes 9. Page 2282.) To enrollment.
upper
Sep 1, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (64-1-4)
assembly
Jul 7, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 6.)
lower
Jul 7, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 25, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Jun 24, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 22.)
lower
Jun 24, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.)
lower
May 26, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-13)
senate
May 13, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 3. Page 914.)
upper
Apr 7, 2009
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
ML
Mark Leno
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 581
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 581. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline