SB 54 California Senate · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Family law: out-of-state same-sex marriages.

Summary
Existing law provides that a marriage contracted outside this state that would be valid by the laws of the jurisdiction in which the marriage was contracted is valid in this state. Existing case law provides that, while on and after November 5, 2008, only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California, marriages of same-sex couples that were performed prior to November 5, 2008, are valid. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding any other provision of law, a marriage between 2 persons of the same sex contracted outside this state that would be valid by the laws of the jurisdiction in which the marriage was contracted is valid in this state if the marriage was contracted prior to November 5, 2008. Existing case law also recognizes that while, effective November 5, 2008, same-sex couples lack the right to enter into a relationship designated "marriage," they possess the right to the core set of basic substantive legal rights and attributes traditionally associated with marriage, including, the opportunity of an individual to establish an officially recognized and protected family possessing mutual rights and responsibilities and entitled to the same respect and dignity accorded a union traditionally designated as marriage. This bill would specify that, notwithstanding any other provision of law, 2 persons of the same sex who contracted a marriage on or after November 5, 2008, that would be valid by the laws of the jurisdiction in which the marriage was contracted shall have the same rights, protections, and benefits, and shall be subject to the same responsibilities, obligations, and duties under law, as specified, as are granted to and imposed upon spouses with the sole exception of the designation of "marriage."
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2009
Committee Review
Sep 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Jan 15, 2009 Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate May 14, 2009 · Assembly Sep 3, 2009

How they voted

24–13
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 38
May 14, 2009
D Democratic24
23 Yea 1
95% Yea
R Republican14
1 Yea 13 Nay
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
34
Key actions
9
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Sep 9, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 23. Noes 14. Page 2337.) To enrollment.
upper
Sep 8, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 2353.)
upper
Sep 4, 2009
Committee
From committee: Pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10 be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 2227.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Sep 4, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Sep 3, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (39-27-3)
assembly
Jul 14, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 9.)
lower
Jul 14, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.)
lower
Jun 26, 2009
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 24, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 23.)
lower
Jun 24, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 13. Noes 5.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 14, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-13-1)
senate
Apr 27, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 15, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 497.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 2, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 8. Noes 3. Page 420.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jan 15, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 6 co-sponsors

Sponsors