Horse racing: thoroughbred associations or fairs: wager deductions.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a thoroughbred association or fair, at the joint request of the association or fair and the horsemen's organization and subject to approval by the California Horse Racing Board, to deduct from the parimutuel pool, for any type of wager, an amount of 10% to 25%, inclusive, of the total amount handled for the meeting of the thoroughbred association or fair that accepts the wager. This bill would instead authorize the deduction of an amount in that range upon the filing of a specified written notice with, and approval by, the board specifying the percentage to be deducted and would provide that the percentage is to remain in effect until the filing of a subsequent notice with, and approval by, the board, unless otherwise specified in the notice. The bill would authorize certain distributions as prescribed in the Horse Racing Law to be modified or redirected upon the filing with, and approval by, the board of a written notice, as specified. The bill would require a notice to modify or redirect a distribution to be accompanied by a certain report of receipts and expenditures, and would require the filing of a report accounting for all receipts and expenditures in any of the affected funds with the board and certain legislative committees within one year of initial approval of a percentage deduction notice and annually thereafter if approval is extended by the board. The bill would require the consent of affected organizations and entities for a distribution modification or redirection and for an extension of a distribution modification or redirection, as provided. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Senate Passage
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 26, 2009
Signed Oct 23, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2009 · Assembly Sep 8, 2009
How they voted
33–2
Passed
Total votes 35
Jun 1, 2009
D
Democratic22
90% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
36
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Amendments
4
Oct 23, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Oct 14, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 2517.) To enrollment.
upper
Sep 10, 2009
Introduced
Senate refuses to concur in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 24. Noes 2. Page 2393.)
upper
Sep 8, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (58-0-3)
assembly
Aug 31, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 27.)
lower
Aug 31, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Aug 19, 2009
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jul 9, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 8.)
lower
Jul 9, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 1, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-2)
senate
May 27, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 18, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 14, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1. Page 849.)
upper
Feb 26, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
DF
Dean Florez
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 517
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 517. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline