Local government: compensation disclosure.
Summary
Existing law provides for the compensation of local government officers and employees, as specified. This bill would require filers, as defined, to annually file a compensation disclosure form, as specified. This bill would require the Secretary of State to develop the form, which would provide for the disclosure of, among other things, salaries and stipends, automobile and equipment allowances, and incentive and bonus payments. This bill would also require a county, city, city and county, school district, special district, or joint powers agency that maintains an Internet Web site to post the information contained on the filed form on that Internet Web site, as specified. The bill would authorize a district attorney or any interested person to commence an action by mandamus to enforce the provisions of the bill, as specified. The duties imposed on local departmental agencies by the bill would create a state-mandated local program. The bill would express a legislative finding and declaration that, to ensure the statewide integrity of local government, disclosure of compensation paid to filers is an issue of statewide concern and not a municipal affair and that, therefore, all cities, including charter cities, would be subject to the provisions of the bill. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
died
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Governor
Introduced Feb 26, 2009
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate May 18, 2009 · Assembly Aug 31, 2010
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
May 18, 2009
D
Democratic22
86% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
40
Key actions
8
Committee
11
Aug 31, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (58-0-2)
assembly
Aug 31, 2010
Committee
Action rescinded whereby the bill was re-referred to Com. on RULES pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
upper
Aug 31, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. On RULES pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
upper
Aug 18, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee August 18.)
lower
Aug 18, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.)
lower
Aug 12, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. On L. GOV. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Jul 2, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 1.)
lower
Jul 2, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 17, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 17.)
lower
Jun 17, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 18, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-3)
senate
May 12, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 29, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 708.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 26, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 6 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 501
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 501. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline