Employment: heat illness prevention.
Summary
Existing law permits the Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board within the Department of Industrial Relations to adopt occupational health and safety standards to protect the welfare of employees, and existing regulations provide for the prevention of heat-related illness of employees, as prescribed. Under existing law, it is a misdemeanor for an employer to violate a safety standard if the violation has a substantial probability of resulting in death or serious physical harm. This bill would incorporate certain of these regulatory provisions into statute. The bill would additionally specify requirements for employers to provide employees access to shade when the temperature exceeds 75 degrees Fahrenheit and to implement designated high-heat and extreme-heat procedures when the temperature equals or exceeds 85 or 95 degrees Fahrenheit, respectively. The bill would prohibit an employer from allowing an employee or a supervisor to engage in outdoor work without receiving training on specified topics and would require the employer to designate a person to ensure that emergency procedures are invoked when appropriate. Because this bill would specify additional safety standards, the violation of which would be a misdemeanor, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 26, 2009
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate May 14, 2009
How they voted
21–11
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
May 14, 2009
D
Democratic22
90% Yea
R
Republican13
84% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
7
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
Set, final hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 24, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 23.)
lower
Jun 24, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on May 6.)
lower
May 6, 2010
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on L. & E. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Aug 20, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RULES.
lower
Jul 14, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 13, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 8.)
lower
Jul 13, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.)
lower
May 14, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-11-3)
senate
May 4, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 22, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3. Page 610.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 26, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
DF
Dean Florez
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 477
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 477. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline