Public works: payment of prevailing wage: violations.
Summary
Existing law generally requires the payment of the general prevailing rate of per diem wages to workers employed on public works projects. Under existing law, whenever a contractor or subcontractor performing a public works project is found by the Labor Commissioner to be either in violation of certain provisions of law, with intent to defraud, or in willful violation of those provisions of law, the contractor or subcontractor or a firm, corporation, partnership, or association in which the contractor or subcontractor has a substantial interest is ineligible to bid on or to receive a public works contract for specified periods of time. This bill would provide that a contractor or subcontractor performing a public works project who is found by the Labor Commissioner to be in violation of the public works law, with intent to defraud, for the first time, is ineligible to bid on or be awarded a contract for a public works project for specified periods of time, with a prescribed exception related to apprenticeship requirements, but would provide that for a 2nd violation of the public works law, with intent to defraud, the contractor or subcontractor shall be ineligible to bid on or be awarded a public works contract.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Jan 7, 2009
Vetoed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate May 6, 2009 · Assembly Sep 1, 2009
How they voted
21–11
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 38
May 6, 2009
D
Democratic24
87% Yea
R
Republican14
78% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Sep 9, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 23. Noes 15. Page 2339.) To enrollment.
upper
Sep 1, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (39-26-4)
assembly
Aug 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 19.)
lower
Aug 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)
lower
Jul 9, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 8.)
lower
Jul 9, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 24, 2009
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 6, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-11-6)
senate
Apr 20, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Mar 25, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 347.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jan 7, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Alex Padilla
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 45
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 45. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline