Public records: auxiliary organizations.
Summary
The California Public Records Act requires state and local agencies to make their records available for public inspection and to make copies available upon request and payment of a fee unless those records are exempt from disclosure. This bill would require specified entities to comply with the act, but would not require these entities to disclose information obtained in the process of soliciting potential donors that has actual or potential independent economic value because it is not generally known to the public or because the individuals can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use. This bill would specify that it is not the intent of the Legislature to designate specified organizations as state agencies by subjecting these organizations to the requirements of the act. The bill would exempt from disclosure under the act the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of persons who volunteer services or donate to specified entities if those persons request anonymity. However, the bill would provide that this exemption does not apply if a volunteer or donor meets specified conditions. This bill would also provide that it is the intent of the Legislature to reject the court's interpretation of state law regarding the application of the act to auxiliary organizations, such as the CSU Fresno Association, at issue in California State University, Fresno Assn., Inc. v. Superior Court (2001) 90 Cal.App.4th 810.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Jan 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 25, 2009
Vetoed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jan 28, 2010 · Assembly Aug 16, 2010
How they voted
33–1
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Jan 28, 2010
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Aug 19, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 22. Noes 10. Page 4655.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 16, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (54-0-7)
assembly
Jun 23, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 22.)
lower
Jun 23, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 17, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in Committee on June 16.)
lower
Jun 17, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED. Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
lower
May 28, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to committee on G.O. and then be re-referred back to committee on Higher Ed.
lower
Jan 28, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-1-1)
senate
Jan 12, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 2655.)
upper
Jan 7, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 25, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 9 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 330
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 330. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline