SB 300 California Senate · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Harbors and ports: Monterey Bay and the Bays of San Francisco, San Pablo, and Suisun: pilotage rates: continuing education.

Summary
(1) Existing law provides for the regulation and licensing of pilots for the Bays of San Francisco, San Pablo, Suisun, and Monterey by the Board of Pilot Commissioners for the Bays of San Francisco, San Pablo, and Suisun. Existing law requires the board to adopt standards and a training program for pilots, inland pilots, and pilot trainees. This bill would instead require the board to adopt training standards and a training program for pilot trainees, and continuing education standards and a continuing education program for pilots and inland pilots. The bill would require that fees from the surcharge for each movement of a vessel using pilot services used for a training program for pilots and inland pilots be used instead to fund a pilot and inland pilot continuing education program. (2) Existing law provides that all records of the board relating to the personal information of a pilot are confidential and shall not be open to public inspection. This bill would include within that provision personal information of an inland pilot, a pilot trainee, and an applicant to the pilot training program. The bill would also revise the information that is required to be in a pilot's or inland pilot's record of account to exclude the name of the vessel's master and where the vessel is registered. (3) Existing law specifies the rates of pilotage for vessels entering or leaving Monterey Bay and the Bays of San Francisco, San Pablo, and Suisun through the Golden Gate Bridge. Existing law establishes the mill rate chargeable to those vessels and authorizes that rate to be changed under certain circumstances, including when the number of licensed pilots is reduced to 60 pilots or falls below 60 pilots. This bill would eliminate the general requirement to change the rate under certain circumstances and instead require that the mill rate in effect on January 1, 2006, be changed, as provided, if the number of pilots licensed by the board is fewer than 60. The bill would also provide that these new requirements would become inoperative if on or after January 1, 2010, the number of pilots licensed by the board is equal to or greater than 60. (4) Existing law also imposes an incremental rate of additional mills per high gross registered ton as is necessary and authorized by the Board of Pilot Commissioners to recover the pilots' costs of obtaining new pilot boats and of funding design and engineering modifications for the purposes of extending the service life of existing pilot boats, excluding costs for repair or maintenance. This bill would also require, until January 1, 2011, a movement fee as is necessary and authorized by the board to be paid as a navigation technology surcharge in order to recover the pilots' costs for the purchase, lease, or maintenance of navigation software, hardware, and ancillary equipment purchased after November 5, 2008, and before January 1, 2011. Existing law requires that all moneys received by the Board of Pilot Commissioners pursuant to the provisions of any law shall be paid into the State Treasury to the credit of the Board of Pilot Commissioners' Special Fund and are continuously appropriated to the board for the payment of the compensation and expenses of the board and its officers and employees. By increasing the amount of revenue deposited into a continuously appropriated fund and by authorizing the expenditure of money in that fund for a new purpose, the bill would make an appropriation. (5) The bill would also make technical changes.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 25, 2009 Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate May 28, 2009 · Assembly Sep 1, 2009

How they voted

21–11
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 38
May 28, 2009
D Democratic24
18 Yea 1 Nay 5
75% Yea
R Republican14
3 Yea 10 Nay 1
71% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
33
Key actions
10
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Sep 8, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 27. Noes 13. Page 2288.) To enrollment.
upper
Sep 1, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (52-13-4)
assembly
Jul 15, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 15.)
lower
Jul 15, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.)
lower
Jul 8, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 7, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 6.)
lower
Jul 7, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 3.)
lower
Jun 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 28, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-11-6)
senate
May 19, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 4. Page 948.)
upper
May 4, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 30, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 1. Page 681.)
upper
Feb 25, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors