Grand theft: cargo.
Summary
Existing law, until January 1, 2010, provides, subject to exceptions, that every person who steals, takes, or carries away cargo of another, as defined, when the cargo taken is of a value exceeding $400, is guilty of grand theft. This bill would revise the above language to provide that every person who steals, takes, or carries away cargo of another, if the value of the cargo taken exceeds $950, except as specified, is guilty of grand theft. The measure would also make these provisions operative indefinitely. By extending the operation of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2008
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Dec 1, 2008
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 10, 2009 · Assembly Sep 8, 2009
How they voted
32–1
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 39
Sep 10, 2009
D
Democratic25
84% Yea
R
Republican14
78% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
40
Key actions
9
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-1-6)
senate
Sep 10, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 33. Noes 1. Page 2378.) To enrollment.
upper
Sep 8, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0)
assembly
Sep 4, 2009
Upper · Passed
Action rescinded whereby the bill was read a third time, passed, and ordered to the Senate.
upper
Aug 31, 2009
Upper · Passed
Action rescinded whereby Assembly amendments were concurred in.
upper
Aug 17, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 1840.) To enrollment.
upper
Jul 2, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 1.)
lower
Jul 2, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 16, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 16.)
lower
Jun 16, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 4, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 21, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 587.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Dec 1, 2008
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JO
Jenny Oropeza
DDemocratic
Co
KD
Kevin D Jeffries
RRepublican
Co
Mark DeSaulnier
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 24
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 24. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline