Child pornography: Internet distribution.
Summary
Existing law includes provisions criminalizing conduct involving obscene matter and child pornography, including making the distribution of this material criminal. Existing law defines the term "distribute" for purposes of crimes relating to obscene matter. This bill would include within this definition of "distribute" making available for access or possession over the Internet. The bill would also provide that nothing in the provisions criminalizing conduct involving obscene matter and child pornography shall be construed to permit an action against an interactive computer service, electronic communication service, or remote computing service, as defined, that is inconsistent with specified provisions of federal law. By revising the definition of existing crimes to expand their application, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Jan 2010
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 23, 2009
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jan 25, 2010
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Jan 25, 2010
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
6
Committee
5
Amendments
2
Jun 30, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 22.)
lower
Jun 29, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.)
lower
Jan 25, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-3)
senate
Jan 19, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jan 15, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jan 14, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 2665.)
upper
Apr 28, 2009
Upper · Passed
Set, first hearing. Held in committee without recommendation.
upper
Feb 23, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 10 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TH
Tom Harman
RRepublican
Co
BB
Bill Berryhill
RRepublican
Co
Bob Huff
RRepublican
Co
CS
Cameron Smyth
RRepublican
Co
CD
Chuck DeVore
RRepublican
Co
CC
Connie Conway
RRepublican
Co
DL
Diane L Harkey
RRepublican
Co
KD
Kevin D Jeffries
RRepublican
Co
MW
Mimi Walters
RRepublican
Co
Robert Dutton
RRepublican
Co
Roger Niello
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 203
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 203. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline