Emergency medical services.
Summary
Under existing law, the State Department of Public Health administers provisions governing the licensure and regulation of health facilities, including hospitals. A violation of these provisions is a crime. Existing law requires any hospital that provides emergency medical services to provide notice of any intended elimination or reduction of emergency services as soon as possible, but not later than 90 days prior to a planned elimination or reduction in services to the department, the local government agency in charge of health services, and specified entities under contract with the hospital to provide the services. Existing law requires a health facility that implements a downgrade or closure to make reasonable efforts to ensure that the community served by the facility is informed. This bill would, instead, require the notice to be provided 120 days prior to the planned reduction or elimination of the level of emergency medical services, and would require the notice to also be provided to all employees of the hospital. It would also require that the hospital provide public notice of, and hold a minimum of 3 public meetings on, the intended change in a manner that is likely to reach a significant number of residents of the community served by the facility. The bill would also require that any health facility implementing a downgrade or change hold a minimum of 3 public meetings, as specified, to inform and ensure that the community served by its facility is informed of the downgrade or closure. Existing law requires, with a certain exception, not less than 30 days prior to closing a general acute care or psychiatric hospital, eliminating a supplemental service, or relocating the provision of a supplemental service to a different campus, the hospital to provide certain notice regarding the proposed closure, elimination, or relocation to the public and the applicable administering department, in accordance with certain procedures. This bill would, instead, require the notice regarding the proposed closure, elimination, or relocation to be provided to the public and the applicable administering department, in accordance with certain procedures, 60 days prior to closing a general acute care or psychiatric hospital, eliminating a supplemental service, or relocating the provision of a supplemental service to a different campus. Because the bill creates a new crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Sep 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 23, 2009
Vetoed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate May 21, 2009 · Assembly Sep 1, 2009
How they voted
21–12
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 38
May 21, 2009
D
Democratic24
87% Yea
R
Republican14
85% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
9
Committee
10
Amendments
3
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Sep 9, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 22. Noes 16. Page 2337.) To enrollment.
upper
Sep 8, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 7. Noes 3. Page 2353.)
upper
Sep 4, 2009
Committee
From committee: Pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10 be re-referred to Com. on HEALTH. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 2227.) Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Sep 3, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Sep 1, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (41-25-3)
assembly
Aug 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 19.)
lower
Aug 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)
lower
Jul 9, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 8, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 8.)
lower
Jul 8, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 5.)
lower
Jun 30, 2009
Committee
Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. Reconsideration granted.
lower
May 21, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-12-5)
senate
Apr 27, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 14, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 13, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 4. Page 420.)
upper
Feb 23, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 196
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 196. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline