In-home supportive services: provider timesheets.
Summary
Existing law provides for the county-administered In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program, under which qualified aged, blind, and disabled persons are provided with services in order to permit them to remain in their own homes and avoid institutionalization. Existing law permits services to be provided under the IHSS program either through the employment of individual providers, a contract between the county and an entity for the provision of services, the creation by the county of a public authority, or a contract between the county and a nonprofit consortium. Under existing law, the State Department of Social Services is required, in consultation and coordination with county welfare departments, to establish and implement statewide hourly task guidelines and instructions to provide counties with a standard tool for consistently and accurately assessing service needs and authorizing service hours to meet those needs. This bill would require the standardized provider timesheet used to track the work performed by providers of services under this chapter to contain a legal certification, to be signed by the provider and recipient, verifying that the information provided in the timesheet is true and correct. The bill would authorize, in addition to other criminal penalties, the imposition of a specified civil penalty against a person who is convicted of fraud, as defined, resulting from intentional deception or misrepresentation in the provision of timesheet information under the IHSS program.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 11, 2009
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate May 28, 2009
How they voted
26–1
Passed · 8 other
Total votes 35
May 28, 2009
D
Democratic22
63% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
5
Committee
5
Amendments
2
Jul 6, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 2, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
lower
Jul 2, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.)
lower
May 28, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (26-1-8)
senate
May 19, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 5, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 4, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 700.)
upper
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
Feb 11, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Abel Maldonado
RRepublican
Co
JJ
John J Benoit
RRepublican
Co
Tom Berryhill
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 141
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 141. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline