Polysomnographic technologists: sleep and wake disorders.
Summary
Existing law, the Physician Assistant Practice Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of physician assistants by the Physician Assistant Committee of the Medical Board of California. Existing law prescribes the medical services that may be performed by a physician assistant under the supervision of a licensed physician and surgeon. Existing law, the Respiratory Care Practice Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of respiratory professionals by the Respiratory Care Board of California. Existing law defines the practice of respiratory therapy and prohibits its practice without a license issued by the board, subject to certain exceptions. This bill would require the Medical Board of California to adopt regulations within one year after the effective date of this act relative to the qualifications for certified polysomnographic technologists, including requiring those technologists to be credentialed by a board-approved national accrediting agency, to have graduated from a board-approved educational program, and to have passed a board-approved national certifying examination, with a specified exception for that examination requirement for a 3-year period. The bill would prohibit a person from using the title "certified polysomnographic technologist" or engaging in the practice of polysomnography unless he or she undergoes a Department of Justice background check, as specified, is registered as a certified polysomnographic technologist, is supervised and directed by a licensed physician and surgeon, and meets certain other requirements. The bill would define polysomnography to mean the treatment, management, diagnostic testing, control, education, and care of patients with sleep and wake disorders, as specified. The bill would further require the board, within one year after the effective date of this act, to adopt regulations related to the employment of polysomnographic technicians and trainees. This bill would require polysomnographic technologists to apply to and register with the Medical Board of California for fees to be fixed by the board at no more than $100 each, and to renew their registration biennially for a fee of no more than $150. The bill would require the deposit of those fees in the Contingent Fund of the Medical Board of California, a continuously appropriated fund, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would further set forth specified disciplinary standards and procedures. The bill would specify that these provisions do not apply to diagnostic electroencephalograms conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 9, 2009
Signed Oct 23, 2009
Floor votes · Senate May 21, 2009 · Assembly Sep 8, 2009
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 35
May 21, 2009
D
Democratic22
81% Yea
R
Republican13
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
8
Committee
5
Amendments
4
Oct 23, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Oct 14, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 37. Noes 1. Page 2518.) To enrollment.
upper
Sep 8, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (54-6-1)
assembly
Aug 31, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 27.)
lower
Aug 31, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.)
lower
Jul 15, 2009
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jul 6, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 2, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
lower
Jul 2, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.)
lower
May 21, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-5)
senate
Apr 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 555.)
upper
Mar 24, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 339.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 9, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jeff Denham
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 132
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 132. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline