Alcoholic beverages: tied-house restrictions: symphony associations.
Summary
The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act contains limitations on sales commonly known as "tied-house" restrictions, which generally prohibit a manufacturer, winegrower, manufacturer's agent, California winegrower's agent, rectifier, distiller, bottler, importer, or wholesaler from furnishing, giving, or lending any money or other thing of value to any person engaged in operating, owning, or maintaining any on-sale licensed premises. Existing law authorizes specific exceptions to this prohibition, including exceptions for donations and sales to nonprofit corporations. This bill would additionally, until December 31, 2014, authorize monetary contributions and contributions of alcoholic beverages by specified alcoholic beverage licensees to a symphony association under specified circumstances, including that the symphony association has been incorporated in the City and County of San Francisco by and through its predecessor organizations for a specified amount of time. This bill would make findings regarding the need for special legislation. The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act provides that a violation of any of its provisions for which another penalty or punishment is not specifically provided is a misdemeanor. This bill would expand existing crimes by imposing additional requirements on a licensee under the act, thus, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Sep 2009
Senate Passage
Oct 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Nov 2009
Introduced Feb 9, 2009
Signed Nov 2, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Oct 14, 2009 · Assembly Sep 11, 2009
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 36
Oct 14, 2009
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
36
Key actions
7
Committee
3
Amendments
4
Nov 2, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Oct 14, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2525.) To enrollment.
upper
Oct 14, 2009
Upper · Passed
Urgency clause adopted.
upper
Sep 12, 2009
Introduced
Senate refuses to concur in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 23. Noes 0. Page 2456.)
upper
Sep 11, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (57-0-4)
assembly
Sep 9, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.)
lower
Sep 4, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. On G.O. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Jul 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 1.)
lower
Jul 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Apr 28, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 680.)
upper
Feb 9, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 131
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 131. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline