Child custody: disabled parent.
Summary
Existing law requires a court to award custody of a child according to the best interest of the child, and further requires a court to grant reasonable visitation rights to a parent unless it is shown that the visitation would be detrimental to the best interest of the child. Existing law requires a court, when determining the best interest of the child, to consider the health, safety, and welfare of the child, among other factors. The California Supreme Court in In re Marriage of Carney (1979) 24 Cal.3d 725 determined that the mere fact of the disability of a parent is not a proper basis upon which to make a determination regarding custody or visitation without further inquiry, as specified. This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to codify the decision of the California Supreme Court described above with respect to custody and visitation determinations by the court involving a disabled parent.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
May 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Aug 2010
Introduced Feb 18, 2010
Signed Aug 23, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Aug 9, 2010 · Assembly Aug 2, 2010
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 37
Aug 9, 2010
D
Democratic25
88% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
6
Committee
2
Amendments
3
Aug 23, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Aug 9, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-4)
senate
Aug 9, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 4409.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 2, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-2)
assembly
Jun 28, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 15.)
lower
Jun 28, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.)
lower
May 11, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 3444.)
upper
Apr 8, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 18, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Roderick Wright
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1188
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1188. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline