Animals at large: estrays: estray laws.
Summary
Existing law provides that, except as specified, state provisions relating to estrays, as defined, do not affect any law or regulation regarding estrays, the poundkeeper, or other pound officer within the limits of any city or county where laws regarding estrays are in force. This bill, instead, would provide that, except as specified, state provisions relating to estrays do not affect any law, ordinance, or regulation regarding estrays, the poundkeeper, or other pound officer, or a public animal control agency or shelter within the limits of any city or county where such laws, ordinances, or regulations are in force. Existing law requires the poundkeeper or other pound officer to immediately notify the Secretary of Food and Agriculture upon the impounding of any bovine animal, horse, mule, or burro. This bill would include a public animal control agency or shelter among those to which this provision applies. The bill would provide that the use of the term "animal control agency or shelter" is intended to update terminology and shall not be construed to expand the application of the provisions in this act to persons other than poundkeepers or pound officers. The bill would provide that a city, county, or city and county that establishes or has established laws, ordinances, or regulations regarding estrays may opt to follow those laws, ordinances, or regulations instead of state laws in the handling of estrays that are not bovine animals in accordance with the applicable laws, ordinances, or regulations of the city, county, or city and county.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Apr 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 18, 2010
Signed Sep 27, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Apr 26, 2010 · Assembly Aug 16, 2010
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Apr 26, 2010
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
7
Committee
4
Amendments
3
Sep 25, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Aug 26, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 4944.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 16, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (58-0-3)
assembly
Jun 21, 2010
Lower · Passed
(June 21 amended measure version correcte June 22.)
lower
Jun 21, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 17, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in Committee on June 16.)
lower
Jun 17, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.)
lower
Apr 26, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-3)
senate
Apr 19, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 6, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 3085.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 18, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
SA
Sam Aanestad
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1176
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1176. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline