Education finance: revenue limit apportionments.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the Controller to draw warrants on the State Treasury in favor of the county treasurer of each county in each month of each year in prescribed amounts and in a prescribed manner. Commencing with the 2008–09 fiscal year, existing law requires the warrants for the principal apportionments for the month of February in the amount of $2,000,000,000 to be drawn in July of the same calendar year, and requires those warrants to be applied toward the minimum funding requirements for school districts and community college districts imposed by Section 8 of Article XVI of the California Constitution for the year in which they are drawn. This bill would prohibit a school district's apportionment deferral from exceeding, at any time during a fiscal year, $225 multiplied by the 2009–10 second principal apportionment average daily attendance if the district's average daily attendance, excluding charter school average daily attendance, for the 2009–10 2nd principal apportionment is equal to or less than 500. The bill would provide that these provisions apply only to apportionment deferrals within a single fiscal year. The bill would make these provisions inoperative on September 1, 2011, and would repeal them on January 1, 2012. (2) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2010
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 3, 2010
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 34
Jun 3, 2010
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican11
81% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
3
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Aug 2, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
lower
Jul 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.)
lower
Jun 3, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-2)
senate
May 28, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 3671.)
upper
May 3, 2010
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 19, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 15, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 3182.)
upper
Feb 18, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Dave Cox
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1136
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1136. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline