Corrections: audits and investigations.
Summary
Existing law establishes the Office of the Inspector General for the purpose of conducting audits and investigations of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, as specified. Under existing law, the Inspector General may require any employee of the department to be interviewed on a confidential basis. Existing law provides that it is not the purpose of these communications to address disciplinary action or grievance procedures that may routinely occur and that if it appears that the facts of the case could lead to punitive action, the Inspector General shall be subject to specified provisions governing interrogations and investigations of public safety officers. This bill would include among those provisions applicable to the Inspector General in interviewing employees of the department a provision that makes it unlawful for any public safety department to deny or refuse to any public safety officer the rights and protections guaranteed to him or her concerning interrogations and investigations, as specified.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Signed into Law
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 12, 2010
Signed Sep 29, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2010 · Assembly Aug 19, 2010
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 37
Jun 2, 2010
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Sep 29, 2010
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Aug 19, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-1)
assembly
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee August 12.)
lower
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 23, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 22.)
lower
Jun 23, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 2, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-3)
senate
May 27, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 3670.)
upper
Apr 13, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3165.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 12, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Roderick Wright
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1032
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1032. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline