Voter-approved local assessment: vehicles.
Summary
Existing law authorizes certain counties to impose a local vehicle license fee not exceeding $10 per vehicle, as provided, for the privilege of operating specified vehicles on public roads in the county. Existing law requires a county imposing this fee to contract with the Department of Motor Vehicles to collect and administer the fee, as specified. This bill would authorize counties and the City and County of San Francisco to impose a voter-approved local assessment for specified vehicles if certain conditions, including approval by local voters, are met. The bill would require the county or the city and county to contract with the department to collect and administer the assessment, as provided. The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law authorize various deductions against the income that is otherwise subject to tax under those laws, including a deduction for local taxes that were paid or incurred by a taxpayer. This bill would require the Franchise Tax Board to notify the department of estimated revenue losses to the state resulting from taxpayers deducting, for purposes of the Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law, the voter-approved local assessments authorized by this bill. This bill would require the department to transmit from the assessments collected an amount equal to these reported losses for deposit in the General Fund.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2008
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Senate Passage
Jun 2009
Assembly Failed
Mar 2010
Governor
Introduced Dec 1, 2008
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly Mar 22, 2010
How they voted
26–23
Failed · 12 other
Total votes 61
Mar 22, 2010
D
Democratic37
70% Yea
R
Republican24
91% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
34
Key actions
5
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Mar 22, 2010
Vote failed
Assembly Vote: fail (26-23-12)
assembly
Aug 27, 2009
Lower · Passed
Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Aug 19, 2009
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jul 8, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 7, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 6.)
lower
Jul 7, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.)
lower
Jul 7, 2009
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to REV. & TAX. suspense file.
lower
Jun 30, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 29.)
lower
Jun 30, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX. (Ayes 9. Noes 5.) Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
May 28, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 5. Page 1066.)
upper
Apr 23, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 3. Page 638.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 15, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX. (Ayes 6. Noes 4. Page 498.) Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
upper
Dec 1, 2008
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
ML
Mark Leno
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 10
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 10. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline