A resolution to propose to the people of the State of California an amendment to the Constitution of the State, by amending Sections 1 and 4 of Article XIIIA thereof, by amending Section 2 of Article XIIIC thereof, by amending Section 3 of Article XIIID thereof, and by amending Section 18 of Article XVI thereof, relating to local government finance.
Summary
(1) The California Constitution prohibits the ad valorem tax rate on real property from exceeding 1% of the full cash value of the property, subject to certain exceptions. This measure would create an additional exception to the 1% limit for a rate imposed by a city, county, city and county, or special district to service bonded indebtedness, incurred to fund specified public improvements, facilities or buildings, and housing, and related costs, that is approved by 55% of the voters of the city, county, city and county, or special district, as applicable. This additional exception would apply only if the proposition approved by the voters results in bonded indebtedness that includes specified accountability requirements. (2) The California Constitution conditions the imposition of a special tax by a city, county, or special district upon the approval of 23 of the voters of the city, county, or special district voting on that tax, except that certain school entities may levy an ad valorem property tax for specified purposes with the approval of 55% of the voters within the jurisdiction of these entities. This measure would change the 23 voter-approval requirement for special taxes to, instead, authorize a city, county, city and county, or special district to impose a special tax with the approval of 55% of its voters voting on the tax. This measure would also make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. (3) The California Constitution prohibits a county, city, town, township, board of education, or school district from incurring any indebtedness exceeding in one year the income and revenue provided in that year, without the assent of 23 of the voters and subject to other conditions. This measure would lower to 55% the voter approval threshold for a city, county, or city and county to incur bonded indebtedness, exceeding in one year the income and revenue provided in that year, that is in the form of general obligation bonds to fund specified public improvements.
Bill status
died
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 6, 2009
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
5
Committee
8
Amendments
3
Aug 31, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Be adopted. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 27).
lower
Jul 8, 2009
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 28, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 26, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Jun 25, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and be adopted as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (June 22).
lower
Jun 15, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 7, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Be adopted, and re-refer to Com. on REV. & TAX. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (May 6).
lower
Apr 28, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 27, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 20, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV., REV. & TAX. and APPR.
lower
Feb 7, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 9.
lower
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about ACA 9
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand ACA 9. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline