Court facilities.
Summary
Existing law establishes the State Court Facilities Construction Fund for the planning, design, construction, rehabilitation, renovation, replacement, leasing, or acquisition of court facilities, as specified. Existing law levies a state court construction penalty, as specified, upon every fine, penalty, and forfeiture imposed and collected for all criminal offenses, and for every parking offense for which a parking penalty, fine, or forfeiture is imposed. Existing law requires that moneys deposited in the county treasury pursuant to these provisions be transmitted to the Controller for deposit in the State Court Facilities Construction Fund, as specified. Existing law requires any amounts required to be transmitted by a county to the Controller pursuant to these provisions to be remitted no later than 45 days after the end of the month in which the penalties were collected. Any remittance made later than this time is considered delinquent and is subject to specified penalties. Existing law requires the Controller, upon receipt of any delinquent payment, to calculate a penalty on the delinquent payment by multiplying the amount of the delinquent payment at a daily rate equivalent to 112% per month for the number of days the payment is delinquent. Existing law requires the county to pay the penalty amount calculated pursuant to these provisions to the Controller, as specified, and requires the Controller to deposit these moneys in the State Court Facilities Construction Fund. This bill would additionally require the Controller to calculate the interest on the delinquent payment, as specified, and would revise the formula for calculating the penalty. The bill would also require a county, city and county, or court to pay the interest or penalty amounts calculated pursuant to these provisions, as specified, to the State Court Facilities Construction Fund. The bill would require that payment be made by the entity responsible for the error or other action that caused the failure to pay, as determined by the Controller in notice given to that party by the Controller.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly May 28, 2009
How they voted
58–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 62
May 28, 2009
D
Democratic38
94% Yea
R
Republican24
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Amendments
7
Jul 1, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 28, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 14, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 11, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 28, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (58-0-4)
assembly
May 21, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 20).
lower
May 5, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 4, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 30, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 27).
lower
Apr 27, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 23, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 22, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 22).
lower
Apr 16, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on INS. by unanimous consent, and then be re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 15, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and INS.
lower
Mar 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To print.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Van Tran
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 982
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 982. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline