Secretary of Food and Agriculture regulation: equine drugs: fruits, nuts, and vegetables standards.
Summary
Existing law prohibits, as specified, the showing of a horse at a public horse show, competition, or sale if the horse has been administered a prohibited substance. Existing law exempts from these provisions on the drugging of horses any individual horse show, competition, or sale that is certified by the Secretary of Food and Agriculture, with a 30-day written notice of a public hearing to the advisory committee, if the secretary determines that specified criteria are satisfied. This bill would delete the exemption from the provisions on the drugging of horses applicable to any horse show, competition, or sale certified by the secretary. Existing law generally creates standards for fruits, nuts, and vegetables. Existing law requires the Secretary of Food and Agriculture to create an industry-funded standardization program for the purpose of implementing these standards. Existing law requires the secretary to adopt regulations that he or she determines are reasonably necessary to carry out this program, including, but not limited to, establishing assessment rates and procedures for payment of assessments. Existing law repeals the standardization program provisions on January 1, 2010. This bill would extend the repeal date until January 1, 2015.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 26, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 9, 2009 · Assembly May 14, 2009
How they voted
37–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 39
Sep 9, 2009
D
Democratic25
92% Yea
R
Republican14
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
10
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 9, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (37-0-2)
senate
Aug 18, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (August 17).
upper
Jul 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jul 7, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (July 7).
upper
Jun 10, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 21, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on F. & A.
upper
May 14, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (64-0-6)
assembly
Apr 30, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 29).
lower
Apr 16, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 15).
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on AGRI. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 26, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on AGRI.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 945
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 945. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline