AB 894 California Assembly · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Ballot measures: fiscal impact statements.

Summary
Existing law requires that a draft of an initiative measure be submitted to the Attorney General prior to circulation of the initiative for signatures so that it may appear on the ballot. Existing law requires the Attorney General to prepare the title and summary for the proposed measure. Existing law requires that, if the Attorney General determines that the proposed measure would affect the revenues or expenditures of the state or local government, he or she shall include in the title of the proposed measure either the estimated increase or decrease in revenues or costs to the state or local government, or an opinion as to whether the measure would result in a substantial net change in state or local finances. Existing law requires the title and summary of the Attorney General to be placed on the heading of a petition for the measure and on each page of the petition. This bill would require the fiscal impact statement included in the title and summary of the Attorney General to be in boldface type. Existing law requires that a ballot pamphlet containing information regarding each statewide measure to appear on a statewide election ballot be prepared by the Secretary of State. Existing law further requires the Legislative Analyst to prepare for the ballot pamphlet an analysis of each statewide measure, including a fiscal analysis of each measure showing the amount of any increase or decrease in revenue or cost to state or local government. Existing law requires that any estimate of increased cost to local governments be set out in boldface print in the ballot pamphlet. This bill would also require, for a statewide measure that would result in increased cost to the state, that the Legislative Analyst provide an analysis of the measure's estimated impact on the state, including an estimate of the percentage of the General Fund that would be expended due to the measure. The measure would also require the Legislative Analyst, to the extent practicable, to utilize a uniform method in each analysis to describe the estimated increase or decrease in revenue or cost of a measure. Existing law requires a condensed statement of the ballot title prepared by the Attorney General and the fiscal impact summary of the Legislative Analyst, as applicable, for each statewide measure appearing on the ballot, followed by the words "Yes" and "No." This measure would require that the uniform estimate of increase or decrease in revenue or cost of the measure prepared by the Legislative Analyst be included in the condensed fiscal impact summary. This bill would incorporate changes made by AB 753 that would become operative only if both bills are enacted and this bill is enacted after AB 753.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 26, 2009 Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 9, 2009 · Assembly Sep 10, 2009

How they voted

310
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 36
Sep 9, 2009
D Democratic23
20 Yea 3
86% Yea
R Republican13
11 Yea 2
84% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
27
Key actions
10
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (60-0-2)
assembly
Sep 10, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3290.)
lower
Sep 10, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 9, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-5)
senate
Jul 23, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 8, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 7).
upper
Jun 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., R., & C.A.
upper
May 14, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 13).
lower
May 12, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 11, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
lower
May 6, 2009
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 22, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 21).
lower
Mar 23, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Feb 27, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
WT
Warren T Furutani
DDemocratic
CA
55