State employees: memoranda of understanding.
Summary
(1) Under existing law, a provision of a memorandum of understanding reached between the state employer and a recognized employee organization representing state civil service employees that requires the expenditure of funds does not become effective unless approved by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act. This bill would approve provisions that require the expenditure of funds pursuant to memoranda of understanding entered into between the state employer and State Bargaining Units 1, 3, 4, 11, 14, 15, 17, 20, and 21, the Service Employees International Union, Local 1000, and would provide that these provisions will become effective even if these provisions are approved by the Legislature in legislation other than the annual Budget Act. (2) The annual Budget Act appropriates specified amounts from the General Fund, unallocated special funds, and unallocated nongovernmental cost funds, for state employee compensation. This bill would appropriate $856,500,000 from those funds for state employee compensation in augmentation of the Budget Act of 2009. (3) This bill would provide that provisions of the memoranda of understanding approved by this bill that require the expenditure of funds will not take effect unless funds for these provisions are specifically appropriated by the Legislature, and would authorize either party to reopen negotiations on all or part of a memorandum of understanding if the Legislature does not approve or fully fund any provision of the memorandum of understanding that requires the expenditure of funds. (4) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
died
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Governor
Introduced Jan 5, 2009
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Sep 12, 2009 · Assembly Jun 3, 2009
How they voted
35–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 36
Sep 12, 2009
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
4
Sep 12, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0-1)
senate
Sep 4, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 27, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on Appropriations suspense file.
upper
Aug 25, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 24).
upper
Aug 20, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
upper
Jun 18, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
upper
Jun 3, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (36-24-2)
assembly
Jun 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 29, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 28).
lower
May 6, 2009
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 22, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 22).
lower
Feb 5, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E.,R. & S.S.
lower
Jan 6, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 5.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 88
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 88. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline