Continuing care contracts: retirement communities: closure.
Summary
Existing law contains provisions relating to supervision of continuing care contracts, including requirements governing continuing care communities and contracts. Existing law requires the State Department of Social Services to regulate activity relating to continuing care contracts, and requires that continuing care retirement communities maintain an environment that enhances residents' independence and self-determination and in that regard imposes various requirements on a care provider. Existing law defines various terms for purposes of those contracts and requirements, and imposes specified civil and criminal penalties for violations of those provisions. This bill would define the term "permanent closure" for purposes of those provisions, to mean prescribed events that will cause the relocation of residents. This bill would impose various requirements on a provider with respect to the permanent closure of a continuing care retirement community facility, or a portion thereof, as specified, including providing 120 days' written notice to the department, and affected residents or designated representatives of these residents of the intended date of closure of a facility. The bill would require a provider, no less than 90 days prior to the permanent closure of a continuing care retirement community facility, or a portion thereof, to provide the department, affected residents and their representatives, and the local long-term care ombudsman program, with a written closure and relocation plan for the facility, containing specified information. The bill would require the department to monitor the implementation of the closure and relocation plan, as necessary, to ensure full compliance by the provider, and would prohibit a provider from taking any action to relocate a resident or to close the facility, until the plan has been prepared and submitted to the department by the provider and provided to the affected residents of the facility, the affected residents' designated representatives, and the local long-term care ombudsman program. The bill would also require the provider, in the case of a permanent closure, to offer the resident the choice of replacement housing, monetary compensation equal to the remaining value of the contract, or an alternative arrangement mutually agreed upon by the provider and the resident. Because this bill would change the definition of a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
May 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 23, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 9, 2009 · Assembly May 11, 2009
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 36
Sep 9, 2009
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican13
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
9
Committee
9
Amendments
5
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2009
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3286.)
lower
Sep 10, 2009
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 9, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-2)
senate
Jun 29, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 22, 2009
Committee
Withdrawn from committee. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 10, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 9).
upper
May 21, 2009
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HUMAN S. and JUD.
upper
May 11, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (62-0)
assembly
Apr 30, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 29).
lower
Apr 22, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 21, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 20, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 14).
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Apr 13, 2009
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 9, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 24, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
1 primary · 5 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 407
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 407. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline