Missing persons: DNA database.
Summary
Existing law requires the Department of Justice to develop a DNA database for all cases involving the report of an unidentified deceased person or a high-risk missing person, as defined, and provides for the collection of DNA samples from unidentified deceased persons and from potential sources for comparison, as specified. Existing law requires that, until January 1, 2010, the database be funded by a $2 increase on death certificates issued by a local governmental agency or by the State of California. Existing law specifies the procedure for identifying the backlog of unidentified remains. This bill would delete the expiration date for the provision authorizing the collection of the $2 increase on death certificates. This bill would also make clarifying changes to the procedure for identifying any backlog of unidentified remains or donated familial samples. By requiring the collection of the increase on death certificates issued by local officials, the bill would also impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Assembly Passage
Jun 2009
Senate Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 12, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 3, 2009 · Assembly Jun 2, 2009
How they voted
26–4
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 36
Sep 3, 2009
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican13
46% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
10
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 3, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (26-4-6)
senate
Aug 18, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (August 17).
upper
Jul 15, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 14).
upper
Jul 1, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 29, 2009
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 18, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 2, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (59-0-3)
assembly
May 29, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 28).
lower
Apr 1, 2009
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 25, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 24, 2009
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 23, 2009
Introduced
From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (March 17).
lower
Mar 4, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 13, 2009
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 15.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JS
Jose Solorio
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 275
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 275. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline