Necessary small schools.
Summary
(1) Existing law defines a necessary small school as an elementary school with an average daily attendance of less than 101, exclusive of pupils attending grades 7 and 8 of a junior high school, maintained by a school district that maintains 2 or more schools, that meets other criteria involving combinations of distance and average daily attendance. Existing law requires the county superintendent of schools to make computations for each elementary and secondary school district that has fewer than 2,501 units of second principal apportionment average daily attendance and maintains at least one school that meets the criteria for a necessary small school. This bill would deem Gasquet Mountain Elementary School and Margaret Keating Elementary School to be necessary small schools and make the Del Norte County Unified School District eligible to receive apportionments for each school pursuant to its status as a necessary small school. The bill also would deem Rail Road Flat Elementary School to be a necessary small school and make the Calaveras Unified School District eligible to receive apportionments for this school pursuant to its status as a necessary small school. This bill would provide that if the average daily attendance of any of these schools exceeds 100, then the school would no longer be eligible to receive apportionments as a necessary small school. (2) This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Del Norte County Unified School District and the Calaveras Unified School District. (3) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Assembly Passage
May 2010
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 3, 2010
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly May 13, 2010
How they voted
58–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 61
May 13, 2010
D
Democratic37
97% Yea
R
Republican24
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
9
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Aug 12, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Jun 28, 2010
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR suspense file.
upper
Jun 22, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 16, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 16).
upper
May 27, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
May 13, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (58-0-3)
assembly
May 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 5).
lower
Apr 22, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 21).
lower
Apr 7, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 24, 2010
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Feb 11, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 4, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 6.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
WC
Wesley Chesbro
DDemocratic
Co
Dave Cox
RRepublican
Co
SA
Sam Aanestad
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1724
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1724. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline