Facilitated Mortgage Workout Program.
Summary
Existing law requires that, upon a breach of the obligation of a mortgage or transfer of an interest in property, the trustee, mortgagee, or beneficiary record a notice of default in the office of the county recorder where the mortgaged or trust property is situated and mail the notice of default to the mortgagor or trustor, among other acts required prior to exercising a power of sale in a nonjudicial foreclosure proceeding. This bill would establish, contingent upon receipt of federal funding for all costs, and only until January 1, 2014, the Facilitated Mortgage Workout (FMW) Program. The program would be a process whereby borrowers and lenders would engage in conciliation sessions for purposes of developing a loan modification plan. These provisions would apply, except as specified, if the loan originated prior to January 1, 2009, the loan is the 1st mortgage or deed of trust secured by the property, the property is occupied by the borrower as the borrower's principal residence, and the unpaid principal balance is not more than $729,750. The program would require that specified information regarding the FMW Program be included with the notice of default sent to a borrower, as defined, on a loan secured by residential real property of one- to 4-family dwelling units that is the primary residence of the borrower, as specified. The bill would require that this additional notice be recorded in the office of the county recorder. By expanding the duties of county recorders, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would provide for an administrator of the program who would be appointed by the Governor and confirmed by the Senate. The program would require a borrower who elects to participate in the program to complete a specified form and return the form to the administrator of the program not later than 30 calendar days after receiving the notice of default. The program would require the borrower to submit other information to the administrator within 15 days of requesting to participate in the program, including tax returns, income verification, a specified deposit of funds, and a letter describing the borrower's financial hardship, as specified. The program would require a borrower who elects to participate in the program to deposit with the administrator 50% of the current mortgage payment each month during participation in the FMW Program. The bill would also prohibit a mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent from reporting negative credit information to a credit reporting agency about a borrower who has completed the FMW Program and accepted a mortgage loan modification. The bill would impose various administrative fees, and a specified minimum deposit, payable by the mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent, or by the borrower, as specified, who participates in the FMW Program. The bill would also provide that the timelines set forth in the provision governing the exercise of the power of sale, as specified, would be suspended until the completion of the program, as specified. The bill would require the administrator of the program, among other duties, to implement rules and standards for selecting qualified neutral conciliation officers and to develop standards for forms and reports required to implement the program. The bill would also require the administrator, upon receipt of a borrower's form whereby he or she elects to participate in the program, to nominate an individual to serve as a neutral conciliation officer from a list of qualified neutral conciliation officers in the county in which the property is located. The bill would establish the compensation for a neutral conciliation officer who provides his or her services to the program and require a neutral conciliation officer to use reasonable efforts to ensure that each FMW Program is completed within 60 calendar days of the neutral conciliation officer's nomination. The bill would require the neutral conciliation officer to prepare a final report, as specified. The bill would also require, only until January 1, 2015, the administrator to report quarterly to the Legislature regarding the FMW Program, as specified. The bill would also require each mortgagee, trustee, beneficiary, or authorized agent participating in the program to post specified data about its loans on its Internet Web site. These provisions would become operative only upon the issuance of a notice from the administrator to the Governor and specified other legislative leaders, and the posting of the notice on an Internet Web site, declaring that the administrator has the capacity to make the program available to any borrower in every county who desires to participate. The bill would also make related and technical changes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
died
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2010
Committee Review
May 2010
Assembly Passage
Jun 2010
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 11, 2010
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 3, 2010
How they voted
32–23
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 61
Jun 3, 2010
D
Democratic37
86% Yea
R
Republican24
95% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
5
Committee
10
Amendments
4
Jun 3, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (32-23-6)
assembly
May 28, 2010
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 28, 2010
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 28).
lower
May 5, 2010
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 22, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (April 22).
lower
Apr 20, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 5.) (April 19).
lower
Apr 13, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
Apr 12, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on B. & F. Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 12, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F. by unanimous consent, and then be re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 8, 2010
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and B. & F. Re-referred. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 8).
lower
Apr 5, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RULES by unanimous consent.
lower
Mar 16, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET.
lower
Mar 15, 2010
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on BUDGET. Read second time and amended.
lower
Jan 21, 2010
Committee
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
lower
Jan 12, 2010
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 11.
lower
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
PN
Pedro Nava
DDemocratic
Co
Bill Monning
DDemocratic
Co
Karen Bass
DDemocratic
Co
Mark DeSaulnier
DDemocratic
Co
Ted Lieu
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1639
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1639. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline