Land use: City of Industry: stadium complex.
Summary
(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, as defined, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect, unless the project is exempt from the act. CEQA provides for various exemptions from its requirements. Existing law requires cities and counties to prepare, adopt, and amend general plans containing specified elements. This bill would exempt from CEQA any activity or approval, necessary or incidental to, the development, planning, design, site acquisition, subdivision, financing, leasing, construction, operation, or maintenance of a stadium complex and associated development included in the same project or approval together with any accessory roadway, utility, or other infrastructure improvement to that stadium complex and associated development, for which an application for the project or approval was submitted on or before January 31, 2009, to the City of Industry, if specified requirements are met. The bill would require the city to require the stadium complex and associated development to comply with those mitigation measures that are contained in a mitigation monitoring and reporting program that is adopted by the City of Industry in connection with the stadium complex and associated development. Because a lead agency would be required to determine the applicability of the exemption, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill also would exempt from any legal requirement concerning the content of a general plan or consistency with a general plan, and prohibit those requirements from resulting in the invalidation of, the city's approval of, and decisions regarding, specified actions taken with respect to the stadium complex and associated development included in the same project or approval and any accessory improvements to that stadium complex and associated development. The bill additionally would provide that a consistency determination is not required by the city for any decision with respect to those actions. (2) The bill would have retroactive application. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (4) The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to declare a fiscal emergency and to call the Legislature into special session for that purpose. The Governor issued a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, and calling a special session for this purpose, on December 19, 2008. This bill would state that it addresses the fiscal emergency declared by the Governor by proclamation issued on December 19, 2008, pursuant to the California Constitution.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Sep 2009
Committee Review
Sep 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Senate Passage
Oct 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Sep 9, 2009
Signed Oct 22, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Oct 14, 2009 · Assembly Sep 10, 2009
How they voted
25–7
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 36
Oct 14, 2009
D
Democratic23
73% Yea
R
Republican13
61% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
5
Committee
3
Oct 22, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Oct 14, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-7-4)
senate
Sep 10, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (42-13-7)
assembly
Sep 9, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (September 9).
lower
Sep 9, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (September 9).
lower
Sep 9, 2009
Committee
Referred to Com. on A.,E.,S.,T., & I.M.
lower
1 primary · 23 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Isadore Hall
DDemocratic
Co
AT
Alberto Torrico
DDemocratic
Co
AA
Anthony Adams
RRepublican
Co
BB
Bill Berryhill
RRepublican
Co
Bill Emmerson
RRepublican
Co
BN
Brian Nestande
RRepublican
Co
CS
Cameron Smyth
RRepublican
Co
Cathleen Galgiani
DDemocratic
Co
CC
Connie Conway
RRepublican
Co
CD
Curren D Price
DDemocratic
Co
CH
Curt Hagman
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 81
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 81. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline