JB
John Boozman
U.S. Senate District (at-large)
2022 general election. Election concluded.
Incumbents
No incumbent is running.
Challengers
Campaign finance
Federal Election Commission filings for the 2022 two-year cycle. Candidates appear in the order they are listed on this page. They are not ranked by money, and these measures are never combined into a single score.
Every candidate below reports through Dec 31, 2022.
| Candidate | Total receipts | Cash on hand | Direct PAC receipts |
|---|---|---|---|
| John Boozman Republican | $6,769,987 | $892,220 | $2,768,717 |
| Natalie James Democratic | $81,481 | $215 | $1,000 |
Each measure below has its own scale and starts at zero, so bars can be read against each other within a measure but not across measures. Every figure is reported through Dec 31, 2022.
Total receipts
Everything the authorized campaign committee took in, including contributions, loans, and transfers.
Highest total receipts: John Boozman at $6,769,987. Lowest: Natalie James at $81,481. The largest reported value sets this scale at $6,769,987.
Cash on hand
The balance the campaign reported at the end of its coverage period.
Highest cash on hand: John Boozman at $892,220. Lowest: Natalie James at $215. The largest reported value sets this scale at $892,220.
Direct PAC receipts
Money the campaign received from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.
Highest direct PAC receipts: John Boozman at $2,768,717. Lowest: Natalie James at $1,000. The largest reported value sets this scale at $2,768,717.
Outside spending supporting
Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate, not coordinated with the campaign and never received by it.
Highest outside spending supporting: John Boozman at $1,845,552. Lowest: Natalie James at $0. The largest reported value sets this scale at $1,845,552.
Outside spending opposing
Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.
Every compared candidate reported $0 for outside spending opposing. The largest reported value sets this scale at $0.
Where each campaign's committee money came from
Each column is one candidate and each figure is that candidate's own money, taken over that candidate's own itemized total. Nothing here is added across candidates, and the two groupings below are never added to each other: the first is who the FEC says runs the giving committee, which covers every dollar, and the second is what interest a source says that committee advances, which is a claim MyRepTracker makes and covers only part of the money.
Contributions each campaign received, by who runs the committee
| Category | John Boozman Republican | Natalie James Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Corporate PACs | $1,142,56139.2% | $0 |
| Trade association PACs | $735,90025.2% | $0 |
| Leadership PACs | $369,80012.7% | $0 |
| Membership organization PACs | $256,8508.8% | $1,00014.7% |
| Non-connected committees | $218,7427.5% | $0 |
| Other candidates' committees | $77,2002.6% | $0 |
| Cooperative PACs | $69,0002.4% | $0 |
| Labor union PACs | $27,5000.9% | $5,80085.3% |
| Corporations without capital stock | $19,5000.7% | $0 |
| Itemized total | $2,917,053 | $6,800 |
Contributions each campaign received, by interest advanced
| Category | John Boozman Republican | Natalie James Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Agribusiness Agriculture | $332,50013.5% | $0 |
| Food and beverage Agriculture | $142,9005.8% | $0 |
| Physicians and medical specialties Health | $136,0005.5% | $0 |
| Insurance Finance, insurance, and real estate | $107,0004.3% | $0 |
| Securities and investment Finance, insurance, and real estate | $106,2504.3% | $0 |
| Pharmaceuticals Health | $94,5003.8% | $0 |
| Defense Defense | $89,0003.6% | $0 |
| Commercial banking Finance, insurance, and real estate | $88,9003.6% | $0 |
| Construction Construction | $85,5003.5% | $0 |
| Technology Communications and technology | $63,9002.6% | $0 |
| Oil and gas Energy and natural resources | $62,0002.5% | $0 |
| Air transport Transportation | $57,5002.3% | $0 |
| Real estate Finance, insurance, and real estate | $54,0002.2% | $0 |
| Telecommunications Communications and technology | $51,5002.1% | $0 |
| Trucking Transportation | $39,5001.6% | $0 |
| Automotive Transportation | $37,0001.5% | $0 |
| Media and entertainment Communications and technology | $35,0001.4% | $0 |
| Electric utilities Energy and natural resources | $33,5001.4% | $0 |
| Hospitals and nursing homes Health | $20,5000.8% | $0 |
| Transportation unions Labor | $14,5000.6% | $5,80085.3% |
| Health insurance Health | $17,0000.7% | $0 |
| Lawyers and law firms Professional services | $16,6500.7% | $0 |
| Mining Energy and natural resources | $16,0000.6% | $0 |
| Pro-Republican Party Ideological and single-issue | $15,8330.6% | $0 |
| Pro-Israel Ideological and single-issue | $7,9000.3% | $0 |
| Accounting Professional services | $7,5000.3% | $0 |
| Credit unions Finance, insurance, and real estate | $7,5000.3% | $0 |
| Nurses and nursing specialties Health | $7,0000.3% | $0 |
| Public sector unions Labor | $6,0000.2% | $0 |
| Cryptocurrency and blockchain Finance, insurance, and real estate | $4,4000.2% | $0 |
| Committees not yet categorized | $712,82028.9% | $1,00014.7% |
| Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees | $447,000 | $0 |
| Itemized total | $2,917,053 | $6,800 |
Independent spending supporting each candidate, by who runs the committee
| Category | John Boozman Republican | Natalie James Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Non-connected committees | $1,782,66796.6% | $0 |
| Membership organization PACs | $62,8853.4% | $0 |
| Itemized total | $1,845,552 | $0 |
Independent spending supporting each candidate, by interest advanced
| Category | John Boozman Republican | Natalie James Democratic |
|---|---|---|
| Pro-Republican Party Ideological and single-issue | $1,215,58265.9% | $0 |
| Physicians and medical specialties Health | $89,1304.8% | $0 |
| Real estate Finance, insurance, and real estate | $62,8853.4% | $0 |
| Committees not yet categorized | $477,95525.9% | $0 |
| Itemized total | $1,845,552 | $0 |
Last-minute contributions reported before an election
Within 48 hours of receiving a contribution or loan of $1,000 or more in the days just before an election, a campaign must notify the FEC. These notices are provisional: the same money appears again in the regular report covering those days, so it is not added to the amounts above and is not compared as a measure. Candidates file them only while their own election is close, so an absence here says nothing about a campaign's fundraising.
| Candidate | Reported on notices | Notices | Covers | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Boozman Republican | $563,273 | 22 | May 5 to Nov 4, 2022 | Covered by regular reports |
| Natalie James Democratic | $1,000 | 1 | Oct 30 to Oct 30, 2022 | Covered by regular reports |
Candidates not compared
These candidates are left out of the comparison rather than shown as zero, because a missing or partial record is not the same as no money.
- Kenneth Cates (Libertarian): No FEC data is stored for cycle 2022.
Direct contributions are money the campaign received. Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with any campaign, and are never added to a candidate's receipts. Source: Federal Election Commission ↗.