Home Alabama Elections 2022 Mike Rogers

Mike Rogers

Republican candidate · 2022 general election · Alabama

MR

Mike Rogers

Republican

Races

Campaign finance

FEC data through Dec 31, 2022. Covering the 2022 two-year cycle only.

The 2022 cycle at a glance

Total receipts
$2,262,995
Everything the campaign took in
Individual contributions
$1,170,065
Itemized and unitemized split not reported
PAC and other committees
$1,012,390
Received from political committees
Campaign spending
$1,737,894
Total disbursements
Cash on hand
$1,028,335
At the end of the reporting period

Where the money came from

These categories divide total receipts of $2,262,995 exactly once, so they add back up to the reported total.

Receipts by funding category for the 2022 cycle
SourceAmountShare of receipts
Individual contributions$1,170,06551.7%
PAC and other committee contributions$1,012,39044.7%
Party committee contributions$19,8690.9%
Candidate self-funding$00.0%
Loans$00.0%
Other receipts, including transfers$60,6712.7%
Total receipts$2,262,995100%

Financial position

Cash, debt, refunds, loans, and transfers as reported through Dec 31, 2022 for the 2022 cycle. These are factual reported values, not a judgement about whether a campaign is healthy, viable, or strong. Independent expenditures are never added to or subtracted from any of them: that money was never the campaign's.

Reported financial position for the 2022 cycle
MeasureAmount
Cash on hand at coverage end$1,028,335
Debts and obligations owed by the committee$0
Debts and obligations owed to the committeeNot reported
Contributions refunded to individuals$16,208
Contributions refunded to committees$1,000
Transfers received from other authorized committeesAlready raised money moving between the candidate's own committees, not new fundraising.$18,400
Transfers made to other authorized committees$130,015
Repayments of candidate loans$0
Repayments of other loans$0

Calculated from the reported values

Each row below is arithmetic MyRepTracker performed on the values above. Where the FEC published the figure itself, the row says so and no calculation was made.

Values calculated from the reported financial position, with the formula for each
MeasureAmountHow it was produced
Contributions net of refunds$2,185,117Calculated as individual + committee + party + candidate contributions, minus contributions refunded to individuals and committees.
Operating expenditures net of offsetsNot reportedAn input this calculation needs is not published by the source behind this record.
Outstanding candidate loans$0Calculated as loans received from the candidate minus repayments of those loans.
Other outstanding loans$0Calculated as other loans received minus repayments of those loans.
Total contributions refunded$17,208Calculated as refunds to individuals plus refunds to committees.

Change since the previous filing

Both columns come from committee C00367862, so the two periods are comparable. A change is the difference between what 30G 2022 reported and what YE 2022 reported, and the direction is stated in words rather than shown only as a sign. 30G 2022 reported through Nov 28, 2022 and YE 2022 through Dec 31, 2022.

Financial position at the two most recent controlling filings of committee C00367862
Measure30G 2022Reported through Nov 28, 2022YE 2022Reported through Dec 31, 2022Change
Cash on hand at period end$1,054,818$1,028,335Down $26,483
Debts owed by the committee$0$0No change
Contribution refunds in the period$0$0No change

Cash compared with one period's spending

Cash on hand of $1,028,335 set beside the $62,200 this campaign spent during YE 2022, through Dec 31, 2022, which is 16.5 times that period's spending. This is a ratio between two reported numbers over one named period. It is not a forecast of how long the money will last, and campaigns do not spend evenly across a cycle.

Outside spending

Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with the campaign. This money was never received or controlled by Mike Rogers. Supporting and opposing spending are kept apart rather than combined into one number, and neither is added to campaign receipts.

Spent supporting

$0
Independent expenditures in the 2022 cycle

Spent opposing

$0
Independent expenditures in the 2022 cycle

What the money was spent on

These categories divide $1,572,926 of itemized spending across 765 transactions, through Dec 30, 2022. That subtotal covers the FEC's published operating-expenditure records, which do not include transfers, loan repayments, refunds, or contributions the campaign made, and is 90.5% of the $1,737,894 in total disbursements reported for the 2022 cycle. Every share below is a share of that subtotal and never of total spending. Purposes were classified under taxonomy spend-1.3.

Two things separate that subtotal from total disbursements. Spending reported without itemization cannot be categorized. And the itemized records run only to Dec 30, 2022, while the totals above cover through Dec 31, 2022, so the last stretch of the reporting period is summarized but not yet broken down here.

Itemized spending by reported purpose for the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
PurposeAmount% ShareTransactions
Fundraising and solicitation $361,11423.0%70
Travel $322,87120.5%60
Advertising and media $265,63716.9%70
Unclassified filing descriptions Spending whose reported purpose could not be placed in the taxonomy. It is counted, not guessed at. $204,10813.0%250
Administration, salary, and overhead $184,86611.8%249
Events $83,5825.3%31
Legal, accounting, and compliance $59,4953.8%14
Campaign materials $33,6122.1%5
Polling and research $28,0001.8%1
Technology and digital services $14,0880.9%7
Consulting, type not specified $14,0130.9%6
Contributions and donations made $1,0000.1%1
Contribution refunds $5410.0%1
Classified$1,368,81887.0%
Unclassified filing descriptions$204,10813.0%
Itemized spending categorized here$1,572,926100%765

Political committees that contributed directly

Money received by the authorized campaign committee from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.

This total will usually differ from the PAC figure in the summary above. The summary is what the campaign reported receiving in total; this ranking adds up the individual contributions that were itemized, which is a different record made at a different time. Neither is a correction of the other, and the gap is not an error in either one.

Top 5 of 227 shown $1,024,135 total · $54,300 shown here

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Sep 6, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Political committees ranked by direct contributions
RankCommitteeAmountShareTransactionsLast activity
1EMPLOYEES OF NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION PAC C00088591$12,5001.2%5Aug 30, 2022
2BAE SYSTEMS INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (BAE SYSTEMS USA PAC) C00281212$11,0001.1%8Jan 26, 2022
3TORCH TECHNOLOGIES, INC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE C00400424$10,8001.1%3Sep 14, 2022
4AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION PAC (BANKPAC) C00004275$10,0001.0%3Sep 16, 2022
5CULAC THE PAC OF CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION C00007880$10,0001.0%3Mar 10, 2022
Show the complete list of 227 committees →

Fundraising channels

Some money arrives through a committee that raised or collected it rather than from a committee that decided to give it. Those committees are listed here instead of among the political committees that contributed, because calling a payment processor or a shared fundraising account a donor would say something the filings do not. None of this is added to, or subtracted from, any total above.

Joint fundraising committees

A joint fundraising committee raises money for several campaigns at once and passes each participant its share. The amounts below are what each committee reported transferring to this campaign. The underlying contributions were made by individuals and committees to the joint effort, so a transfer is jointly raised money arriving, not a committee funding Mike Rogers.

1 organization shown $28,900 total

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Sep 6, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Joint fundraising committees ranked by the amount they reported transferring
RankCommitteeAmountShareTransactionsLast activity
1MIKE ROGERS VICTORY C00610055$28,900100.0%3Sep 28, 2022

Who the committees behind this money were

Every committee here is placed by the registration it filed with the FEC for the 2022 cycle: its designation, its committee type, and the organizational form it reported. That is the FEC's own record and involves no judgement by MyRepTracker, so this covers every itemized dollar. A committee's registration can change between cycles, and each cycle is judged by its own.

Contributed to Mike Rogers

Committees itemized $1,024,135 in contributions to this campaign.

Political committees contributing to this campaign, grouped by who the FEC says runs them in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
Kind of committeeAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Corporate PACs $574,48556.1%107239
Trade association PACs $158,09515.4%4580
Leadership PACs $87,5008.5%1724
Non-connected committees $79,9557.8%2031
Membership organization PACs $51,1005.0%1728
Labor union PACs $22,5002.2%47
Other candidates' committees $20,5002.0%1011
Cooperative PACs $15,0001.5%56
Corporations without capital stock $15,0001.5%23
Itemized total for this direction$1,024,135

What interests those committees advance

The FEC publishes no industry or interest field, so unlike the section above this one is a claim MyRepTracker makes. A committee is placed here only when there is a document behind the claim that a reader can open: its own statement of organization, its own published mission statement, or a named third party. Every assignment carries that document on the committee's own page. A committee's name is never evidence of anything.

Categorized is not the same as reviewed. Most of these sectors were assigned by machine from the committee's own filing rather than read by a person. Each committee's own page says which of the two its assignment is, and names the document behind it either way.

Coverage is partial on purpose, and the part that is not covered is shown at full size rather than left out. Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees are excluded outright: their giving is an officeholder's or a party's decision, so no interest label describes it. Categories are taxonomy interest-1.7.

Contributed to Mike Rogers

Committees itemized $1,024,135 in contributions to this campaign. $108,000 of that came from leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees, which are not interest groups. Of the remaining $916,135, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $678,385 and committees not yet categorized account for $237,750.

Political committees contributing to this campaign, grouped by the interest they are categorized as advancing in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
InterestAmount% ShareCommitteesTransactions
Defense Defense $174,50019.0%2479
Agribusiness Agriculture $68,6007.5%2238
Air transport Transportation $60,9006.6%930
Technology Communications and technology $55,7906.1%1320
Construction Construction $43,0004.7%717
Insurance Finance, insurance, and real estate $32,5003.5%512
Food and beverage Agriculture $31,0003.4%710
Automotive Transportation $30,9953.4%512
Health insurance Health $25,0002.7%45
Commercial banking Finance, insurance, and real estate $23,5002.6%49
Telecommunications Communications and technology $20,0002.2%69
Mining Energy and natural resources $19,0002.1%46
Real estate Finance, insurance, and real estate $17,5001.9%37
Electric utilities Energy and natural resources $15,0001.6%24
Transportation unions Labor $12,5001.4%35
Trucking Transportation $12,5001.4%23
Credit unions Finance, insurance, and real estate $10,0001.1%13
Oil and gas Energy and natural resources $5,0000.5%22
Lawyers and law firms Professional services $4,5000.5%24
Physicians and medical specialties Health $4,0000.4%23
Pharmaceuticals Health $3,5000.4%23
Securities and investment Finance, insurance, and real estate $3,5000.4%12
Hospitals and nursing homes Health $2,5000.3%11
Pro-Israel Ideological and single-issue $2,1000.2%11
Nurses and nursing specialties Health $1,0000.1%11
Committees not yet categorized $237,75026.0%67108
Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees Not part of the base the shares beside it are taken over. $108,000Not applicable2735
Base the shares are taken over$916,135100%
Itemized total for this direction$1,024,135

Last-minute contributions reported before an election

In the days just before an election, a campaign must tell the FEC within 48 hours about any contribution or loan of $1,000 or more. These notices arrive faster than the regular reporting schedule, and the same money is reported again in the report covering those days. Nothing here is added to receipts: it is a preview of money the ordinary reports will carry, not money beside them.

Reported on notices

$161,995
Across 10 notices, received May 9, 2022 to Nov 7, 2022

Still only provisional

$0
Every notice is now covered by a regular report

The most recent notice was filed on Nov 19, 2022. A notice stops being the only record of its money once a regular report covers the same days; those are marked reconciled below and the amounts appear in Mike Rogers's reported totals through the ordinary schedule.

48-hour notices filed for the 2022 cycle, newest first
FiledAmountEntriesCoversStateFiling
Nov 19, 2022 amendment$7,0005Nov 3 to Nov 4, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Nov 7, 2022$17,0006Nov 7 to Nov 7, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Nov 3, 2022$34,00017Nov 1 to Nov 2, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
Oct 31, 2022$52,79525Oct 20 to Oct 28, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
May 21, 2022$14,5005May 18 to May 19, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
May 18, 2022$17,3007May 16 to May 17, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
May 14, 2022$10,4003May 13 to May 13, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
May 13, 2022$7,0004May 10 to May 12, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
May 11, 2022$1,0001May 10 to May 10, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗
May 9, 2022$1,0001May 9 to May 9, 2022Covered by a regular reportFEC filing ↗

Where the individual money was reported from

Contributions from individuals that the campaign itemized, grouped by the state each contributor gave as their address. Contributions of $200 or less in aggregate are not itemized and carry no address, so they are not here at all. These places account for $1,164,856 of the $1,188,465 this campaign reported from individuals and from transfers by its other authorized committees, across 883 itemized contributions.

From Alabama

$580,912
49.9% of the itemized money that has a place

From everywhere else

$583,444
50.1% of the itemized money that has a place

Money from outside Alabama is not money from outside the country, and neither figure is evidence that anything unlawful happened. People may contribute to campaigns in states they do not live in, and United States citizens living abroad may contribute at all.

What kind of place it came from

Itemized individual contributions by kind of place, 2022 cycle
Kind of placeAmountContributionsShare
States and the District of ColumbiaContributors who gave an address in one of the fifty states or the District of Columbia.$1,164,356882100.0%
Not placedContributions the FEC could not attribute to a place. They are reported here and are never assigned to a state or counted in the in-state and out-of-state split.$5001Not counted

Places, largest first

Top 10 of 32 places shown as bars. Every place is in the table below.

  • Alabama this campaign's state $580,912
  • Virginia $132,350
  • Florida $94,850
  • New York $47,100
  • Maryland $43,950
  • Texas $42,100
  • District of Columbia $31,750
  • California $30,400
  • Kentucky $20,300
  • Connecticut $19,750
Every place with itemized individual contributions reported for the 2022 cycle
PlaceAmountContributionsShare
Alabama this campaign's state$580,91243549.9%
Virginia$132,35014011.4%
Florida$94,850598.1%
New York$47,100334.0%
Maryland$43,950403.8%
Texas$42,100233.6%
District of Columbia$31,750432.7%
California$30,400142.6%
Kentucky$20,30071.7%
Connecticut$19,750171.7%
Georgia$18,194101.6%
Indiana$14,50051.2%
Louisiana$14,50051.2%
Massachusetts$14,50041.2%
Colorado$9,25070.8%
Nevada$6,80030.6%
Utah$6,05030.5%
Pennsylvania$5,750100.5%
New Jersey$5,50070.5%
North Carolina$3,65020.3%
South Carolina$3,50020.3%
Montana$2,90010.2%
North Dakota$2,90010.2%
Vermont$2,90010.2%
Arizona$2,00020.2%
Tennessee$2,00010.2%
Missouri$1,50010.1%
Minnesota$1,25020.1%
Mississippi$1,25020.1%
Maine$1,00010.1%
Michigan$1,00010.1%
Not reported not placed$5001Not counted
Reported with a place$1,164,356882100%

Contributions are transactions, not people: one contributor giving every month is counted once for each contribution. No contributor's name, address, employer, or occupation is stored or shown anywhere on this site.

  • $500 could not be attributed to a place and is left out of the in-state and out-of-state figures rather than assigned to a state.

How this compares

Compared with U.S. House campaigns in Alabama, 2022 cycle: 17 campaigns with a complete Federal Election Commission record for the cycle. This is a position in that group, not a score, a grade, or a judgement about the campaign.

Total receipts

Everything the authorized campaign committee took in for this cycle, including contributions, loans, and transfers.

  • This campaign $2,262,995
  • Cohort median $85,150
Total receipts for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Alabama, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$2,262,995
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$9,968
Median$85,150
75th percentile$1,540,807
Highest in the cohort$3,615,103
Campaigns counted17

14 of the 17 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 82th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Share of receipts from political committees

Direct contributions from PACs and other political committees as a share of total receipts. Campaigns reporting no receipts at all have no share and are left out of this measure.

  • This campaign 44.7%
  • Cohort median 2.6%
Share of receipts from political committees for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Alabama, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign44.7%
Lowest in the cohort0.0%
25th percentile0.0%
Median2.6%
75th percentile38.5%
Highest in the cohort71.2%
Campaigns counted15

13 of the 15 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 87th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Cash on hand

The balance reported at the end of the coverage period. Campaigns report at different times, so this compares balances as of each campaign's own coverage end.

  • This campaign $1,028,335
  • Cohort median $1,969
Cash on hand for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Alabama, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$1,028,335
Lowest in the cohort-$2,083
25th percentile$122
Median$1,969
75th percentile$453,898
Highest in the cohort$2,895,932
Campaigns counted17

14 of the 17 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 82th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending supporting

Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate. This money was never received or controlled by the campaign.

  • This campaign $0
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending supporting for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Alabama, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$0
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$0
Highest in the cohort$225,190
Campaigns counted17

0 of the 17 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 0th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending opposing

Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.

  • This campaign $0
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending opposing for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Alabama, 2022 cycle
MeasureValue
This campaign$0
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$0
Highest in the cohort$493,500
Campaigns counted17

0 of the 17 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 0th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Every comparison is drawn from one two-year cycle and one office. Only campaigns whose FEC record for that cycle is complete are counted; the rest are reported beside the cohort and are never counted as zero. One authorized committee is counted once however many candidacies report it, so where a candidate's committees are all reported by another FEC record, that record supplies the figures for both. A campaign is never compared with another cycle, with a career total, or with a candidate for a different office.

What these numbers mean

Receipts are not the same as contributions
Total receipts include everything the campaign took in, such as contributions, loans, and transfers. Contributions are only the money given by people and committees.
Direct contributions are not outside spending
A direct contribution is money received by the campaign's own authorized committee. An independent expenditure is money another organization spent on its own, without coordinating with the campaign. The Federal Election Commission treats these as different activities, and so does this page.
The organizations named here are political committees
Direct rankings count what one political committee gave to a campaign; outside-spending rankings count what a committee spent independently. A separate conduit section groups individual contributions only when the campaign's memo record supplies a registered conduit committee's FEC ID. It never attributes donors to employers or interest groups, and it never exposes contributor names. Sites using broader attribution rules may therefore report different organization totals.
A cycle may be only partly reported
Filings arrive throughout a two-year cycle. A current cycle shows only what has been filed and processed through the coverage date shown above, so it is not comparable with a finished cycle.
This view is cycle specific
It covers the 2022 two-year cycle only.

Source: Federal Election Commission ↗. MyRepTracker ingests FEC records directly and does not add its own influence, risk, or corruption score.