Photo of Rob Hutton
R Wisconsin Senate · District 5

Sen. Rob Hutton

Compare
Total votes
411
all sessions
Attendance
100%
1 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
96%
of cast votes
Lower than 97% of chamber peers
Bipartisan score
3%
crosses aisle rarely
Higher than 93% of chamber peers
Sponsored
313
bills & resolutions
Near the chamber average
Committees
4
assignments
313 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
313
Primary
313
Co-sponsor
0
This page
313
matching current filters
Primary SJR 116
Signed into law · Wisconsin Senate · Lead sponsor
Relating to: prohibiting the governor from using the partial veto to create or increase any tax or fee (second consideration).

Maddy summarySJR 116 is a proposed constitutional amendment that would prohibit governors from using their partial veto power to create or increase taxes or fees. If approved by voters, it would amend Article V, Section 10(1)(c) of the state constitution to block governors from altering tax or fee provisions during the veto process. This measure directly affects the governor's executive authority and state budget negotiations, requiring legislative action for any tax or fee changes. The amendment is now pending voter approval in the November 2026 election after passing the legislature with 18 "yes" votes.

Signed into law Jun 23, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary SJR 6
Signed into law · Wisconsin Senate · Lead sponsor
Relating to: honoring the life and enduring legacy of Robert George Uecker.

Maddy summaryThis Senate Joint Resolution (SJR 6) is a ceremonial honor recognizing the life and legacy of Bob Uecker, the longtime Milwaukee Brewers radio broadcaster and entertainer. It formally acknowledges his 54-year broadcasting career with the Brewers, his acting roles (including *Mr. Belvedere* and *Major League*), philanthropy, and contributions to baseball and Wisconsin culture. The resolution has no policy impact - it simply expresses the Wisconsin Legislature’s tribute to Uecker’s "extraordinary contributions" through a symbolic resolution passed on March 20, 2025.

Signed into law May 26, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 300
Vetoed · Wisconsin Senate · Lead sponsor
Relating to: eliminating the 13-week limit on the garnishment of earnings of certain debtors.

Maddy summarySB 300 eliminates a 13-week cap on wage garnishment for certain debtors, meaning creditors can continue taking a portion of a debtor's wages indefinitely after the initial garnishment period. The bill directly affects individuals who owe debts (like unpaid taxes or court judgments) and have had their wages garnished. Key changes include removing the 13-week limit and establishing that the first notice of garnishment occurs when a debtor is served under specific procedures, with garnishment starting on the next payroll date. This alters the timing and duration of wage deductions without changing the underlying debt collection process.

Vetoed May 13, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 25
Vetoed · Wisconsin Senate · Lead sponsor
Relating to: court-issued criminal complaints in officer-involved deaths.

Maddy summarySB 25 would require courts to defer to a district attorney's determination that there is no basis to prosecute a law enforcement officer involved in a death. Specifically, it prohibits judges from issuing criminal complaints against such officers unless new or unused evidence is presented, after the district attorney has already concluded there is no case to pursue. The bill directly affects officers in officer-involved death cases defined under Wisconsin law (s. 175.47 (1) (c)). This change shifts authority from courts to district attorneys in determining whether charges proceed, streamlining the process for cases where prosecutors have already declined to file.

Vetoed May 13, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 76
Vetoed · Wisconsin Senate · Lead sponsor
Relating to: dismissing or amending certain criminal charges and deferred prosecution agreements for certain crimes.

Maddy summarySB 76 requires courts to approve any dismissal or amendment of criminal charges for specific "covered crimes" (like domestic abuse violations, certain traffic offenses, or crimes under Chapter 948). Prosecutors must provide reasons for seeking such changes, and courts can only approve if the action aligns with deterring these offenses. The bill also prohibits deferred prosecution agreements for these crimes and mandates annual court reports detailing approved dismissals. This directly affects prosecutors, courts, and defendants charged with the listed offenses.

Vetoed May 13, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 610
Vetoed · Wisconsin Senate · Lead sponsor
Relating to: increasing the maximum penalty for certain controlled substances offenses if the violation occurs near a homeless shelter and providing a penalty.

Maddy summarySB 610 increases the maximum prison sentence for distributing methamphetamine or similar drugs near homeless shelters. If someone distributes these drugs within 1,000 feet of a homeless shelter - knowing or reasonably aware the shelter is nearby - their maximum prison term rises by 5 years. The bill specifically targets violations of drug distribution laws (Section 961.65) occurring in these proximity circumstances. This policy change directly affects individuals convicted of such drug distribution offenses near shelters, without altering existing penalties for other drug offenses.

Vetoed May 13, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 405
Vetoed · Wisconsin Senate · Lead sponsor
Relating to: a civil cause of action for a minor injured by a gender transition procedure.

Maddy summarySB 405 creates a legal right for minors injured by gender transition procedures to sue healthcare providers for physical, psychological, emotional, or physiological harm. The bill defines "gender transition procedure" broadly (including puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones) but excludes treatments for certain medical conditions like disorders of sexual development. It requires providers to document a minor's gender identity for two years, obtain certification from multiple healthcare professionals confirming the procedure is the only treatment for a mental health concern, and provide specific risk warnings to minors and parents before consent. The law allows lawsuits to be filed before the minor turns 33, with defenses available if providers follow the required documentation and consent protocols.

Vetoed May 13, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 276
Vetoed · Wisconsin Senate · Lead sponsor
Relating to: challenges to the validity of administrative rules and making an appropriation. (FE)

Maddy summarySB 276 changes how legal fees are handled when courts invalidate agency rules. It requires courts to award reasonable attorney fees and costs to parties successfully challenging administrative rules or guidance documents, provided the challenge is based on constitutional violations, exceeding statutory authority, or improper rule-making procedures. These fees and costs must be paid from specific state appropriations outlined in statutes (20.865 (1) (a), (g), or (q)), not from general funds. The bill directly affects individuals or organizations challenging agency rules and state agencies responsible for paying these costs.

Vetoed May 13, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 275
Vetoed · Wisconsin Senate · Lead sponsor
Relating to: statements of scope for administrative rules. (FE)

Maddy summarySB 275 establishes time limits for statements of scope used by state agencies when creating administrative rules. It requires permanent rule scope statements to expire after 30 months and emergency rule statements after 6 months, after which agencies cannot base new rules on expired statements. The bill also mandates separate scope statements for concurrent emergency and permanent rule proposals and prohibits agencies from using a single scope statement for multiple rules. These changes apply to all Wisconsin administrative agencies creating new rules under the state's rulemaking process.

Vetoed May 13, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 289
Vetoed · Wisconsin Senate · Lead sponsor
Relating to: requirements for proposed administrative rules that impose any costs.

Maddy summarySB 289 requires state agencies to provide detailed economic impact analyses for proposed rules that impose costs on businesses, local governments, or individuals. Agencies must quantify expected implementation and compliance costs (and potential savings) for each affected group, attribute all costs directly to the rule (not other laws or federal requirements), and include this in their analysis. If an independent analysis shows costs exceed $10 million over two years, the rule must be paused until costs are addressed or offset. This bill directly affects state agencies creating new rules and the businesses, local governments, and individuals who would bear the financial impact.

Vetoed May 13, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Showing 1 to 10 of 313 bills
1 2 3 32 Next