Photo of Rob Brooks
R Wisconsin House · District 59

Rep. Rob Brooks

Compare
Total votes
575
all sessions
Attendance
99%
8 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
100%
of cast votes
Near the chamber average
Bipartisan score
0%
crosses aisle rarely
Near the chamber average
Sponsored
402
bills & resolutions
Near the chamber average
Committees
5
assignments
402 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
402
Primary
402
Co-sponsor
0
This page
402
matching current filters
Primary AJR 10
Signed into law · Wisconsin House · Lead sponsor
Relating to: the freedom to gather in places of worship during a state of emergency (second consideration).

Maddy summaryAJR 10 is a proposed constitutional amendment that would amend Article I, Section 18 to prohibit state or local governments from closing places of worship or banning gatherings there during a state of emergency (including public health emergencies). If approved by voters, this change would directly affect religious congregations and local officials responsible for emergency orders. The amendment would require that places of worship be treated equally with other businesses during emergencies, preventing restrictions specifically targeting them. This is a voter-approved constitutional change, not a law, and is currently awaiting submission to the November 2026 ballot.

Signed into law May 26, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 100
Vetoed · Wisconsin House · Lead sponsor
Relating to: designating athletic sports and teams operated or sponsored by public schools or private schools participating in a parental choice program based on the sex of the participants.

Maddy summaryAB 100 requires public and participating private schools to designate athletic teams and sports as "males" or "females" based solely on the sex assigned at birth (as recorded on a birth certificate). It prohibits students assigned male at birth from participating on female-designated teams or using female-designated locker rooms. The bill allows students denied participation or harmed by violations to sue for relief, and gives schools legal recourse if they face penalties for following the policy. This directly affects student athletes in school sports programs and defines participation eligibility based on biological sex at birth.

Vetoed May 13, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 102
Vetoed · Wisconsin House · Lead sponsor
Relating to: designating University of Wisconsin and technical college sports and athletic teams based on the sex of the participants.

Maddy summaryAB 102 requires University of Wisconsin and technical college athletic programs to designate intercollegiate and club sports teams exclusively for "males" or "females" based on birth sex as recorded on a student's birth certificate. It prohibits students assigned male at birth from participating on teams designated for females or using female-designated locker rooms. The bill creates legal remedies for female students denied participation or harmed by violations, and for institutions facing penalties for compliance. It applies to all such teams starting in the first semester after the law takes effect, overriding existing anti-discrimination protections for these specific athletic contexts.

Vetoed May 13, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 104
Vetoed · Wisconsin House · Lead sponsor
Relating to: prohibiting gender transition medical intervention for individuals under 18 years of age.

Maddy summaryAB 104 prohibits health care providers from performing or referring minors under 18 for medical interventions intended to change their physical characteristics to match a gender different from their biological sex. It specifically bans surgeries (like hysterectomy or orchiectomy), mastectomies, puberty-blocking drugs, and high-dose cross-sex hormone treatments. Exceptions apply for genetic disorders of sex development, treating complications from prior procedures, or immediate life-threatening conditions. Violations could result in license revocation for health care providers by the licensing board.

Vetoed May 13, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 202
Vetoed · Wisconsin House · Lead sponsor
Relating to: voidable provisions in residential rental agreements and the application of the Wisconsin Consumer Act to leases. (FE)

Maddy summaryAssembly Bill 202 primarily removes residential rental agreements from the scope of the Wisconsin Consumer Act. It changes how certain problematic provisions in residential leases are handled, allowing tenants to elect to void the entire agreement or sever only the voidable clauses, rather than the agreement being automatically void. Such voidable clauses include those that authorize landlords to take action against tenants for contacting law enforcement or health services, or for being a victim of a crime. If a tenant voids the agreement, it converts to a periodic tenancy under similar terms, or if a provision is severed, the rest of the agreement remains in effect. Tenants who suffer financial loss due to these voidable provisions can sue for double damages, costs, and attorney fees, excluding rent payments.

Vetoed May 13, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 241
Vetoed · Wisconsin House · Lead sponsor
Relating to: required ratio of journeyworkers to apprentices in apprenticeship programs and contracts.

Maddy summaryAB 241 amends Wisconsin statute 106.015(1) to prohibit requiring more than one journeyworker for every two apprentices in apprenticeship programs or contracts. This directly affects apprenticeship programs, particularly those governed by collective bargaining agreements, by limiting the minimum journeyworker-to-apprentice ratio. The bill prevents state agencies from enforcing or authorizing stricter ratios (e.g., requiring two journeyworkers per apprentice) through rules, program approvals, or contracts. It takes effect for collective bargaining agreements when they expire or are modified, renewed, or extended. The legislation aims to standardize ratio requirements across apprenticeship programs statewide.

Vetoed May 13, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 73
Vetoed · Wisconsin House · Lead sponsor
Relating to: statutory recognition of specialized treatment court and commercial court dockets.

Maddy summaryAB 73 creates a new statute (Chapter 798) to formally recognize two types of specialized court programs in Wisconsin: treatment courts and commercial courts. Treatment courts (e.g., drug, mental health, veterans courts) address underlying issues like addiction to reduce recidivism through treatment and supervision, while commercial courts handle business disputes more efficiently. The bill establishes these dockets within the existing court system, requiring judges to receive specialized training and operate using graduated sanctions and rewards. It directly affects courts handling these case types, aiming to improve outcomes for participants and streamline dispute resolution.

Vetoed May 13, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 269
Vetoed · Wisconsin House · Lead sponsor
Relating to: delivery network couriers and transportation network drivers, Department of Financial Institutions’ approval to offer portable benefit accounts, providing for insurance coverage, modifying administrative rules related to accident and sickness insurance, and granting rule-making authority. (FE)

Maddy summaryAB 269 creates "portable benefit accounts" for delivery drivers and transportation network drivers (e.g., app-based food or package delivery workers) who are classified as independent contractors. The bill defines key terms like "application-based driver" and specifies that these workers are not considered employees if companies avoid controlling their schedules or restricting work for other platforms. It also establishes a 10% penalty for workers who misuse funds from these benefit accounts and modifies insurance rules for accident/sickness coverage. The bill grants the Department of Financial Institutions authority to regulate these accounts and related insurance provisions. (Note: This bill was vetoed by the Governor on August 8, 2025.)

Vetoed May 13, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 167
Vetoed · Wisconsin House · Lead sponsor
Relating to: various changes to the unemployment insurance law and requiring approval by the Joint Committee on Finance of certain federally authorized unemployment benefits. (FE)

Maddy summaryAB 167 requires the governor or state agency to notify the Joint Committee on Finance before implementing any increase to unemployment benefits above current state law (e.g., higher weekly rates or additional benefit weeks). The committee must approve such "benefit augmentations" before they take effect, and it retains the right to terminate them at any time. This applies to federally funded benefits but excludes federal extended benefits under Section 108.141. The bill also makes minor technical updates to unemployment claim requirements, such as requiring out-of-state claimants to register with local job centers. These changes aim to centralize oversight of unemployment benefit adjustments at the state level.

Vetoed May 13, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary AB 146
Vetoed · Wisconsin House · Lead sponsor
Relating to: requests for information from employers about unemployment insurance claims.

Maddy summaryAB 146 would require Wisconsin employers to provide written reasons for objecting to unemployment insurance claims and give them at least 12 business days to respond to information requests from the unemployment department. The department would also be permitted to seek additional details directly from employees about their eligibility, employment, or wages. This bill applies to claims filed for weeks beginning after its effective date, affecting employers, the unemployment department, and employees involved in claims. It modifies the existing process for handling claim disputes without changing benefit eligibility rules.

Vetoed May 13, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Showing 1 to 10 of 402 bills
1 2 3 41 Next