Relating to concurrent juvenile jurisdiction on military installations
HB 4364 establishes a formal process for West Virginia to share juvenile jurisdiction with federal courts over military installations in the state. It allows military installations to request concurrent jurisdiction for juveniles (under 18) who commit state law offenses like delinquency or status offenses (e.g., truancy or underage drinking) on federal military land. The bill requires military officials to submit a written request with specific boundaries to the Governor, who must accept it in writing and record the agreement with the Secretary of State. Once recorded, West Virginia courts gain shared authority with federal courts to handle these cases when federal courts waive exclusive jurisdiction. This applies to all military land in West Virginia, including National Guard facilities.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Mar 2026
House of Delegates Passage
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Mar 2026
Signed into Law
Jun 2026
Introduced Jan 15, 2026
Signed Jun 29, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 6 comparisons
What changed between versions
hb4364 s mil amt _1 3-1 adopted.htm
→
hb4364 hfa mcgeehan 3-12 _1 adopted.htm
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill's title was updated to reflect a new amendment proposal by Delegate McGeehan. The substantive change modifies the legal rights of juveniles on federal military land, shifting the language from mandatory entitlement ('is entitled to' and 'has the right to') to permissive discretion ('may'). This change restricts the automatic application of certain state laws on military property, allowing authorities to decide case-by-case whether to apply them rather than requiring it.
Scope change
The scope of the bill was narrowed regarding the application of state laws on military land; the requirement for automatic jurisdiction was replaced with discretionary authority.
ELIGIBILITY
Changed the legal status of juveniles on military land from having an automatic right to state law application to having the possibility of such application at the discretion of the court or authority.
ENFORCEMENT
Altered the enforcement mechanism by removing mandatory language ('is entitled to', 'has the right to') and replacing it with permissive language ('may'), giving officials discretion in handling juvenile cases on federal property.
TECHNICAL
Updated the bill header and committee attribution to reflect the new amendment proposal by Delegate McGeehan instead of the original Military Committee proposal.
Floor votes · Senate Mar 11, 2026 · House of Delegates Jan 28, 2026
How they voted
33–0
Passed
Total votes 33
Mar 11, 2026
D
Democratic2
100% Yea
R
Republican31
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
46
Key actions
11
Committee
9
Mar 30, 2026
Signed into law
Approved by Governor 3/27/2026
lower
Mar 14, 2026
Signed into law
Approved by Governor 3/27/2026 - Senate Journal
upper
Mar 14, 2026
Signed into law
Approved by Governor 3/27/2026 - House Journal
lower
Mar 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate concurred in House amendments and passed bill (Roll No. 684)
upper
Mar 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
House concurred in Senate amendment with amendment (Roll No. 593)
lower
Mar 11, 2026
Upper · Passed
Passed Senate with amended title (Roll No. 458)
upper
Mar 10, 2026
Upper · Passed
Committee amendment adopted (Voice vote)
upper
Mar 9, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported do pass, as amended by Military
upper
Mar 6, 2026
Committee
To Judiciary
upper
Mar 6, 2026
Upper · Passed
Reported do pass with amend and title amend but first to Judiciary
upper
Jan 30, 2026
Introduced
Introduced in Senate
upper
Jan 28, 2026
Lower · Passed
Passed House (Roll No. 26)
lower
Jan 22, 2026
Lower · Passed
By substitute, do pass
lower
Jan 19, 2026
Committee
To House Judiciary
lower
Jan 19, 2026
Committee
To House Homeland Security
lower
Jan 15, 2026
Committee
To House Judiciary
lower
Jan 15, 2026
Introduced
Introduced in House
lower
Jan 15, 2026
Committee
To Judiciary
lower
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Doug Smith
RRepublican
Co
Bill Ridenour
RRepublican
Co
Chuck Sheedy
RRepublican
Co
Greg Watt
RRepublican
Co
Rick Hillenbrand
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 4364
Scope: WV
Hi! I can help you understand HB 4364. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline