SB 6086 Washington Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Strengthening security for Washington state judicial officers and court personnel.

SB 6086 authorizes Washington state court bailiffs and security consultants to conduct threat assessments and access limited criminal history data (including unconvicted incidents) specifically to investigate threats against judges, justices, and court personnel. It requires staff to be trained for these duties, strictly restricts data use to threat investigations, and mandates referrals to local law enforcement for verified threats. The bill clarifies that "judicial officer" includes all state and federal court staff (from supreme courts to municipal courts) and adds new rules for securely handling nonconviction data. These changes aim to strengthen security protocols while limiting data access to only authorized threat-related purposes under strict confidentiality rules.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Feb 2026
Senate Passage
Feb 2026
House Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 13, 2026 Last action Mar 12, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons

What changed between versions

Substitute Bill Engrossed Substitute Bill · 3 edits · Feb 16, 2026
MINOR
The bill was reclassified from a 'Substitute' to an 'Engrossed Substitute' version, indicating it has passed the Senate and is ready for the House. The most significant substantive change is renaming 'court security consultants' to 'court security personnel,' which likely broadens the scope of who can access threat assessment data and conduct investigations. Additionally, the definition of 'judicial officer' was expanded to include industrial appeals judges, extending the protections and data access provisions to this specific group.
Scope change
The bill's scope was slightly expanded to include industrial appeals judges under the definition of 'judicial officer,' and the role of 'court security consultants' was broadened to 'court security personnel.'
DEFINITION

The term 'court security consultants' was changed to 'court security personnel' throughout the bill, potentially expanding the pool of authorized staff who can handle sensitive threat data.

The definition of 'judicial officer' was updated to explicitly include 'industrial appeals judges appointed under Title 51 RCW,' extending the bill's protections to this specific category of judges.

TECHNICAL

The bill status changed from 'Substitute Senate Bill' to 'Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill,' reflecting its progression through the legislative process.

Floor votes · Senate Feb 16, 2026

How they voted

483
Passed
Total votes 51
Feb 16, 2026
D Democratic31
31 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican20
17 Yea 3 Nay
85% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
20
Key actions
10
Committee
10
Feb 25, 2026
Committee
Referred to Rules 2 Review.
lower
Feb 25, 2026
Lower · Passed
Minority; without recommendation.
lower
Feb 25, 2026
Lower · Passed
Minority; do not pass.
lower
Feb 25, 2026
Lower · Passed
CRJ - Majority; do pass.
lower
Feb 25, 2026
Lower · Passed
Executive action taken in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 8:00 AM.
lower
Feb 24, 2026
Lower · Passed
Public hearing in the House Committee on Civil Rights & Judiciary at 10:30 AM.
lower
Feb 16, 2026
Upper · Passed
Floor amendment(s) adopted.
upper
Feb 3, 2026
Upper · Passed
Minority; without recommendation.
upper
Feb 3, 2026
Upper · Passed
Minority; do not pass.
upper
Feb 3, 2026
Upper · Passed
Executive action taken in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 8:30 AM.
upper
Jan 22, 2026
Upper · Passed
Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM.
upper
1 primary · 9 co-sponsors

Sponsors