Joint Resolution Amending Court Rules Regarding Jury Selection
This joint resolution amends Utah's court rules to clarify procedures for jury selection in felony cases and hearing formats. It updates Rule 17.5 to require courts to consider specific factors (like participant preferences, technology access, and safety) when setting in-person, remote, or hybrid hearings, and amends Rule 18 to standardize jury selection methods. The changes directly affect courts, judges, attorneys, and defendants in felony trials by providing clearer guidelines for hearing formats and jury selection. No funding is appropriated, and the resolution follows Utah's constitutional process for amending court rules.
Bill status
passed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Feb 2026
House Passage
Feb 2026
Governor
Introduced Jan 27, 2026
Last action Mar 7, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
Substitute #1
→
Substitute #2
·
3 edits
MINOR
This bill amends Utah court rules to clarify that felony jury selection must be conducted in person unless both parties agree to do it virtually. It also updates the rules for requesting and resolving changes to hearing formats (in-person, remote, or hybrid) for other criminal proceedings.
Scope change
The bill specifically adds a mandatory requirement for in-person jury selection in felony cases, whereas the previous version of the rule did not explicitly mandate this for jury selection.
REQUIREMENT
Added a specific requirement in Rule 18 that felony jury selection must be conducted in person at the trial location unless both the prosecution and defense agree to conduct it virtually.
Modified Rule 17.5 to clarify that the general discretion to choose hearing formats does not apply to felony jury selection, which is now governed by the new Rule 18(b) requirement.
TECHNICAL
Corrected minor formatting errors and typos found in the original text of the bill.
Floor votes · Senate Feb 24, 2026
How they voted
23–1
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 29
Feb 24, 2026
D
Democratic6
83% Yea
N
Forward1
100% Yea
R
Republican22
77% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
44
Key actions
8
Committee
9
Mar 4, 2026
Lower · Passed
House/ return to Rules due to fiscal impact [House Rules Committee]
lower
Mar 4, 2026
Lower · Passed
House/ comm rpt/ substituted [House Judiciary Committee]
lower
Mar 4, 2026
Lower · Passed
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation [House Judiciary Committee]
lower
Feb 27, 2026
Committee
House/ to standing committee [House Judiciary Committee]
lower
Feb 24, 2026
Introduced
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
lower
Feb 24, 2026
Lower · Passed
Senate/ passed 3rd reading
lower
Feb 10, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate/ committee report favorable [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
upper
Feb 9, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
upper
Feb 4, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate Comm - Not Considered [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
upper
Jan 30, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate Comm - Not Considered [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
upper
Jan 28, 2026
Committee
Senate/ to standing committee [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
upper
Jan 27, 2026
Introduced
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SJR 10
Scope: UT
Hi! I can help you understand SJR 10. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline