Vitamin K Amendments
SB 170 requires healthcare providers and unlicensed midwives to administer vitamin K to newborn infants within 24 hours of birth. Parents may decline this administration by signing a form acknowledging the risks of not receiving vitamin K, which must be included in the infant's medical record. The bill defines key terms like "health care provider" and "unlicensed direct-entry midwife" and applies to all newborns in Utah. This directly affects newborns, their caregivers, and healthcare providers during delivery.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Mar 2026
House Passage
Feb 2026
Signed into Law
Mar 2026
Introduced Jan 21, 2026
Signed Mar 18, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 7 comparisons
What changed between versions
Substitute #3
→
Substitute #4
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill was revised to remove the requirement for unlicensed midwives to educate parents about Vitamin K, limiting the education mandate to licensed health care providers only. Additionally, the explanation required from providers was expanded to include the 'benefits' of the procedure, and the specific requirement for parents to sign a form acknowledging risks was removed from the text, though the process for declining remains.
Scope change
The scope of mandatory education was narrowed by excluding unlicensed direct-entry midwives from the requirement to educate parents.
REQUIREMENT
Removed the obligation for unlicensed direct-entry midwives to educate parents about Vitamin K administration; this duty now applies only to licensed health care providers.
Expanded the provider's explanation requirement to include both the 'risks and benefits' of Vitamin K, whereas the previous version only required explaining the risks of not receiving it.
Deleted the specific text requiring a parent to sign a form acknowledging risks to decline Vitamin K; the section now only states that parents may decline and that the form becomes part of the medical record.
Floor votes · Senate Mar 7, 2026 · House Mar 7, 2026
How they voted
22–6
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 29
Mar 7, 2026
D
Democratic6
100% Yea
N
Forward1
100% Yea
R
Republican22
68% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
69
Key actions
11
Committee
6
Amendments
3
Mar 18, 2026
Signed into law
Governor Signed
executive
Mar 11, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate/ signed by President/ sent for enrolling
upper
Mar 7, 2026
Upper · Passed
House/ signed by Speaker/ returned to Senate
upper
Mar 7, 2026
Lower · Passed
Senate/ concurs with House amendment
lower
Mar 7, 2026
Upper · Passed
House/ passed 3rd reading
upper
Mar 4, 2026
Lower · Passed
House/ return to Rules due to fiscal impact [House Rules Committee]
lower
Mar 4, 2026
Lower · Passed
House/ comm rpt/ substituted/ amended [House Health and Human Services Committee]
lower
Mar 3, 2026
Lower · Passed
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation [House Health and Human Services Committee]
lower
Mar 3, 2026
Introduced
House Comm - Amendment Recommendation [House Health and Human Services Committee]
lower
Feb 27, 2026
Committee
House/ to standing committee [House Health and Human Services Committee]
lower
Feb 26, 2026
Introduced
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
lower
Feb 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
Senate/ passed 3rd reading
lower
Jan 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate/ committee report favorable [Senate Health and Human Services Committee]
upper
Jan 26, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation [Senate Health and Human Services Committee]
upper
Jan 23, 2026
Committee
Senate/ to standing committee [Senate Health and Human Services Committee]
upper
Jan 21, 2026
Introduced
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 170
Scope: UT
Hi! I can help you understand SB 170. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline