Public Employee Retaliatory Action Amendments
HB 73 amends Utah's Public Employee Retaliatory Action law to specifically prohibit state employers from making complaints to professional licensing boards against employees who report wrongdoing. This directly protects public employees (including whistleblowers) from retaliation that could threaten their professional licenses. The key change adds "making a complaint to a licensing body" to the list of prohibited retaliatory actions, alongside dismissal or pay cuts. The law now explicitly covers situations where an employer tries to use licensing authorities to punish an employee for reporting issues.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Jan 2026
House Passage
Mar 2026
Senate Passage
Mar 2026
Signed into Law
Mar 2026
Introduced Jan 20, 2026
Signed Mar 17, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced
→
Enrolled
·
2 edits
·
Mar 17, 2026
MINOR
This bill amends the Utah Protection of Public Employees Act to expand the definition of retaliatory action. It specifically adds making a complaint to a professional licensing board as a prohibited retaliatory act, provided the complaint was made in violation of whistle-blowing statutes. This change aims to protect employees from being penalized when they file complaints that result in disciplinary action against them by their employer.
Scope change
The bill's scope broadens to include complaints filed against an employee with a professional licensing board as a form of retaliation, whereas previously this specific act was not explicitly listed.
DEFINITION
The definition of 'Retaliatory action' was modified to include making a complaint against an employee to a person that licenses the employee to practice a profession or perform other types of work.
The definition of 'Retaliatory action' was modified to add a new subsection (f) for threatening to take retaliatory actions, replacing the previous subsection (e).
Floor votes · Senate Mar 5, 2026 · House Jan 23, 2026
How they voted
24–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 29
Mar 5, 2026
D
Democratic6
100% Yea
N
Forward1
100% Yea
R
Republican22
77% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
39
Key actions
6
Committee
3
Mar 17, 2026
Signed into law
Governor Signed
executive
Mar 6, 2026
Lower · Passed
House/ signed by Speaker/ sent for enrolling
lower
Mar 5, 2026
Lower · Passed
Senate/ signed by President/ returned to House
lower
Jan 29, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate/ committee report favorable [Senate Government Operations and Political Subdivisions Committee]
upper
Jan 28, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation [Senate Government Operations and Political Subdivisions Committee]
upper
Jan 28, 2026
Committee
Senate/ to standing committee [Senate Government Operations and Political Subdivisions Committee]
upper
Jan 26, 2026
Introduced
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
upper
Jan 23, 2026
Upper · Passed
House/ passed 3rd reading
upper
Jan 20, 2026
Introduced
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 73
Scope: UT
Hi! I can help you understand HB 73. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline