Artificial Intelligence Transparency Amendments
HB 286, the Artificial Intelligence Transparency Amendments, requires developers of large "frontier AI models" (those trained with massive computing power and used by over 1 million people monthly, especially in chatbots interacting with minors) to create and publish public safety and child protection plans. It mandates developers to summarize risk assessments for these models, report serious safety incidents to Utah's Office of AI Policy, and prohibits false claims about risks. The bill establishes whistleblower protections for employees reporting safety concerns and creates a dedicated fund to enforce these requirements. These changes directly affect major AI developers, focusing on transparency around risks of serious harm to people or property.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 20, 2026
Last action Mar 7, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced
→
Substitute #1
·
3 edits
MINOR
The bill was amended to add a new funding mechanism for enforcement, create a new section for severability, and renumber the remaining sections to accommodate these additions. The original bill required developers to create safety plans and report incidents but lacked a dedicated account to fund enforcement activities; the new version creates the 'AI Transparency Enforcement Restricted Account' to ensure the Attorney General has resources to investigate violations. Additionally, the whistleblower protection sections were renumbered to align with the new structure.
Scope change
The bill's scope expanded to include a specific funding source for enforcement activities, ensuring the state has the financial means to investigate safety violations and pursue penalties against non-compliant developers.
FISCAL
Created a new 'AI Transparency Enforcement Restricted Account' in the General Fund to collect civil penalties and receive legislative appropriations specifically for investigating and enforcing the AI Transparency Act.
TECHNICAL
Added a new Section 13-72b-109 containing severability language to ensure that if any part of the bill is ruled unconstitutional, the rest of the law remains in effect.
Renumbered the whistleblower protection sections (formerly 13-72b-201 through 204) to 13-72b-201 through 204 and shifted the effective date section to Section 14 to accommodate the new enforcement and severability sections.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
2
Committee
3
Jan 28, 2026
Lower · Passed
House/ comm rpt/ substituted [House Economic Development and Workforce Services Committee]
lower
Jan 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation [House Economic Development and Workforce Services Committee]
lower
Jan 26, 2026
Committee
House/ to standing committee [House Economic Development and Workforce Services Committee]
lower
Jan 20, 2026
Introduced
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 286
Scope: UT
Hi! I can help you understand HB 286. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline