Medication Amendments
SB 69 prohibits pharmaceutical manufacturers from restricting contracts between pharmacies and 340B entities (like hospitals serving low-income patients) or interfering with how 340B drugs are delivered. It specifically bans manufacturers from blocking pharmacies from working with 340B programs, requiring 340B entities to buy from specific suppliers, or demanding extra data sharing beyond federal requirements. The bill also allows Utah's Public Employees' Benefit Program to adjust its practices to address any financial changes from these rules. It takes effect on May 7, 2025, and explicitly states it won't conflict with federal 340B program rules.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Feb 2025
Senate Passage
Mar 2025
House Passage
Mar 2025
Signed into Law
Mar 2025
Introduced Jan 21, 2025
Signed Mar 27, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 9 comparisons
What changed between versions
Amended 3/4/2025 11:03:401
→
Substitute #1
·
5 edits
MODERATE
The bill was reformatted from a detailed multi-section amendment to a simplified substitute version with fewer sections. The substantive policy content regarding 340B drug discount protections remains largely similar, but the substitute version consolidates provisions and removes detailed reporting requirements and specific claim information sharing rules that were present in the original version.
Scope change
The bill's scope was narrowed by removing Section 31A-46-312, which contained detailed provisions about claim information sharing, public reporting requirements, and specific definitions related to bad debt and uncompensated care.
REQUIREMENT
Removed detailed claim information sharing rules that allowed pharmaceutical manufacturers to request specific prescription data from 340B entities.
Eliminated annual public reporting requirements that would have required 340B entities to submit detailed financial and operational data to the Insurance Department.
DEFINITION
Simplified definitions by removing detailed explanations of bad debt, financial assistance, and uncompensated care that were previously included.
ENFORCEMENT
Removed provisions that specified how manufacturers could use claim information and prohibited uses such as establishing purchase restrictions or recouping discounts.
TECHNICAL
Changed the House Sponsor field from 'Steve Eliason' to blank in the substitute version.
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
37
Key actions
3
Committee
1
Amendments
1
Mar 6, 2025
Legislature · Passed
Senate/ signed by President/ sent for enrolling
legislature
Mar 5, 2025
Upper · Passed
House/ signed by Speaker/ returned to Senate
upper
Mar 5, 2025
Lower · Passed
House/ passed 3rd reading
lower
Mar 5, 2025
Introduced
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
lower
Feb 28, 2025
Introduced
Senate Comm - Amendment Recommendation
upper
Feb 4, 2025
Committee
Senate/ to standing committee
upper
Jan 21, 2025
Introduced
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 69
Scope: UT
Hi! I can help you understand SB 69. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline