School Trespass Amendments
HB 477 clarifies that public comments at school board meetings following reasonable restrictions (like relevance to school board duties) cannot be used as grounds for criminal trespass charges. It also narrows the definition of "school property" under trespass laws to exclude school district offices and other non-school facilities owned by school districts. The bill requires school boards to adopt written policies by July 2023 allowing public comment on relevant topics during open meetings, while ensuring comments complying with these rules won’t trigger trespass penalties. These changes directly affect school boards (which must create comment policies) and attendees at school meetings (whose comments gain legal protection). The bill takes effect on May 7, 2025, with no funding impact.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
House Passage
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Mar 2025
Signed into Law
Mar 2025
Introduced Feb 11, 2025
Signed Mar 27, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced
→
Enrolled
·
4 edits
·
Mar 27, 2025
MODERATE
This bill clarifies that lawful public comments at school board meetings cannot be used as a basis for criminal trespass charges, while simultaneously narrowing the definition of 'school property' to exclude LEA offices and other non-school buildings. It also reorganizes the criminal trespass statute to better define prohibited conduct and penalties.
Scope change
The scope of 'school property' is narrowed to exclude LEA offices and other non-school facilities owned or controlled by the school district.
DEFINITION
Added clarification that 'school property' does not include LEA offices or other property owned or controlled by the LEA that is not a school.
Removed redundant definitions of 'Enter', 'School official', and 'School property' that appeared in a different section, consolidating them into one subsection.
ENFORCEMENT
Clarified that public comments complying with time, place, manner, and germaneness restrictions cannot be used to establish criminal trespass intent.
MODIFIED
Reorganized the statute structure by renumbering subsections and removing duplicate definitions.
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Mar 27, 2025
Signed into law
Governor Signed
executive
Mar 8, 2025
Legislature · Passed
House/ signed by Speaker/ sent for enrolling
legislature
Mar 8, 2025
Lower · Passed
Senate/ signed by President/ returned to House
lower
Mar 5, 2025
Upper · Passed
Senate/ committee report favorable
upper
Mar 4, 2025
Upper · Passed
Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
upper
Feb 28, 2025
Committee
Senate/ to standing committee
upper
Feb 28, 2025
Introduced
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
upper
Feb 28, 2025
Upper · Passed
House/ passed 3rd reading
upper
Feb 26, 2025
Lower · Passed
House/ committee report favorable
lower
Feb 25, 2025
Lower · Passed
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
lower
Feb 14, 2025
Committee
House/ to standing committee
lower
Feb 11, 2025
Introduced
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 477
Scope: UT
Hi! I can help you understand HB 477. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline