Limitations on the Use of Polygraphs
HB 17 prohibits law enforcement officers, prosecutors, courts, and government officials from requiring or using polygraph examinations (lie detector tests) on victims of sexual offenses during criminal investigations or prosecutions. The bill defines key terms like "polygraph examination" and clarifies that a victim's refusal to take such a test cannot stop an investigation, charging, or prosecution. It directly affects sexual offense victims by preventing coercive or invasive questioning during legal proceedings. The law makes no changes to funding or other legal procedures beyond this specific restriction.
Bill status
passed
3 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Feb 2025
Senate Passage
Jan 2025
Governor
Introduced Jan 21, 2025
Last action Mar 8, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced
→
Substitute #1
·
5 edits
MODERATE
This bill limits the use of polygraph tests on victims of sexual offenses. It prohibits law enforcement and prosecutors from requiring victims to take lie detector tests during investigations or prosecutions of sexual crimes. The bill also clarifies that refusing a polygraph test cannot stop criminal proceedings.
Scope change
The bill expands protections for sexual offense victims by explicitly banning polygraph examinations as a condition of investigation or prosecution, whereas the original version had more formatting issues and contained some inconsistencies in the definitions section.
DEFINITION
Fixed formatting and numbering issues in the definitions section, particularly correcting the sequential numbering of terms like 'Sexual assault kit' and 'Sexual offense'.
Changed the definition of 'Child' from 'a person' to 'an individual' for consistency with other terms in the bill.
Changed the definition of 'Witness' from 'any person' to 'an individual' for consistency.
REQUIREMENT
Changed language from 'request or compel' to 'ask or require' when describing what law enforcement cannot do regarding polygraph examinations.
TECHNICAL
Updated Senate Sponsor name from Luz Escamilla to Michael K. McKell.
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
4
Committee
5
Amendments
1
Feb 21, 2025
Upper · Passed
Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation
upper
Feb 20, 2025
Introduced
Senate Comm - Amendment Recommendation
upper
Feb 18, 2025
Committee
Senate/ to standing committee
upper
Feb 3, 2025
Introduced
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
upper
Jan 31, 2025
Upper · Passed
House/ passed 3rd reading
upper
Jan 27, 2025
Lower · Passed
House/ committee report favorable
lower
Jan 24, 2025
Lower · Passed
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation
lower
Jan 22, 2025
Committee
House/ to standing committee
lower
Jan 21, 2025
Introduced
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 17
Scope: UT
Hi! I can help you understand HB 17. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline