Relating to a district or county attorney participating as counsel in certain proceedings.
HB 917 restricts district and county attorneys from representing opposing sides in legal cases against the state, both during and after their employment. Specifically, it prohibits them from serving as "counsel adversely to the state" in any court case except in limited family law matters (as an attorney ad litem under Family Code Chapter 262) and bars them from taking such opposing roles after leaving office if they previously represented the state. The law applies only to offenses committed on or after its effective date of September 1, 2025, leaving prior cases governed by existing law. This aims to prevent conflicts of interest by ensuring prosecutors do not later work against the state they once represented.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
House Passage
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Mar 6, 2025
Last action Apr 29, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced
→
Engrossed
·
1 edit
·
Apr 25, 2025
MINOR
The bill text has been updated from an introduced version to an engrossed version, primarily involving formatting and layout changes rather than substantive policy modifications. The core legal provisions regarding district or county attorneys participating as counsel in proceedings remain unchanged, with no alterations to eligibility, funding, definitions, or enforcement mechanisms.
TECHNICAL
Formatting and layout changes were applied to the bill text, including removal of placeholder text, adjustment of line breaks, and reorganization of section headers to match standard legislative formatting conventions.
Floor votes · House Apr 24, 2025
How they voted
136–5
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 144
Apr 24, 2025
D
Democratic59
89% Yea
R
Republican85
97% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Apr 29, 2025
Committee
Referred to Jurisprudence
upper
Apr 29, 2025
Introduced
Read first time
upper
Apr 28, 2025
Introduced
Received from the House
upper
Apr 25, 2025
Lower · Passed
Passed
lower
Apr 24, 2025
Lower · Passed
Passed to engrossment
lower
Apr 3, 2025
Lower · Passed
Committee report sent to Calendars
lower
Apr 3, 2025
Lower · Passed
Committee report distributed
lower
Mar 19, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported favorably w/o amendment(s)
lower
Mar 12, 2025
Lower · Passed
Left pending in committee
lower
Mar 12, 2025
Lower · Passed
Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
lower
Mar 6, 2025
Committee
Referred to Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
lower
Mar 6, 2025
Introduced
Read first time
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
David Spiller
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 917
Scope: TX
Hi! I can help you understand HB 917. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline