Relating to a requirement that certain water districts make audio and video recordings of open meetings available on the Internet.
HB 638 requires certain water districts (under Water Code Chapters 36, 49, or 60) to record audio and video of their regular open meetings and specific work sessions or special meetings where voting occurs or public comment is taken. These recordings must be made available online in an archived format. The law applies only to meetings held on or after September 1, 2025, and does not affect meetings held before that date. This bill directly impacts larger water districts by mandating public access to their meeting recordings online.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2025
Committee Review
May 2025
House Passage
May 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Mar 4, 2025
Last action May 15, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced
→
Engrossed
·
3 edits
·
May 14, 2025
MINOR
HB 638 was amended to clarify which water districts must record open meetings and to add a new recording requirement for smaller water districts. The bill now distinguishes between water districts located in larger counties versus those in smaller counties, creating different recording obligations based on location and district size.
Scope change
The bill's scope was expanded to include all water districts subject to Chapter 36, 49, or 60 of the Water Code, with applicability now dependent on county population size rather than just district enrollment or size.
ELIGIBILITY
Water districts in counties with 125,000+ population must make both video and audio recordings of open meetings, while those in smaller counties must only make audio recordings.
REQUIREMENT
A new subsection (b-7) was added requiring water districts in counties with less than 125,000 population to make audio recordings of regularly scheduled open meetings.
The requirement for water districts in larger counties to make video and audio recordings was clarified to apply to all or part of the district located in those counties.
Floor votes · House May 14, 2025
How they voted
139–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 144
May 14, 2025
D
Democratic59
98% Yea
R
Republican85
95% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
7
Committee
7
May 15, 2025
Committee
Referred to Local Government
upper
May 15, 2025
Introduced
Read first time
upper
May 14, 2025
Introduced
Received from the House
upper
May 14, 2025
Lower · Passed
Passed
lower
May 13, 2025
Lower · Passed
Passed to engrossment
lower
May 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
Committee report sent to Calendars
lower
Apr 30, 2025
Lower · Passed
Committee report distributed
lower
Apr 24, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported favorably as substituted
lower
Mar 12, 2025
Lower · Passed
Left pending in committee
lower
Mar 12, 2025
Lower · Passed
Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
lower
Mar 4, 2025
Committee
Referred to Natural Resources
lower
Mar 4, 2025
Introduced
Read first time
lower
4 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Carl Tepper
RRepublican
P
Carrie Isaac
RRepublican
P
Erin Zwiener
DDemocratic
P
Terri Leo-Wilson
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 638
Scope: TX
Hi! I can help you understand HB 638. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline