Relating to the composition and duties of a court security committee.
HB 2176 requires local court administrators to establish a court security committee for each county. The committee must include the local administrative judge (or designee), sheriff's office representatives, constable offices, county commissioners court, judges from various courts, a justice of the peace, and county attorney representatives. It mandates the committee to adopt security policies and procedures for local courts. This bill directly affects county court operations and security coordination by defining committee membership and responsibilities under Texas law.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2025
Committee Review
Apr 2025
House Passage
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Mar 14, 2025
Last action Apr 24, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced
→
Engrossed
·
4 edits
·
Apr 23, 2025
MODERATE
This bill reorganizes and clarifies the duties of local administrative judges and court security committees in Texas. It adds new requirements for judges to establish security committees, modifies how these committees are composed, and clarifies that these committees are not subject to public records laws.
Scope change
The bill expands the scope of local administrative judge responsibilities to include mandatory establishment of court security committees with specific composition requirements.
REQUIREMENT
Added a new subsection requiring local administrative judges to establish court security committees to adopt security policies and procedures.
Modified the duties of court security committees to clarify their role in making recommendations about courthouse security funding without directing resource assignments.
ELIGIBILITY
Modified the composition requirements for court security committees to include specific roles such as sheriff representatives, constable representatives, and various court judges.
DEFINITION
Added a new exemption stating that court security committees are not governmental bodies for public records and open meetings law purposes.
Floor votes · House Apr 23, 2025
How they voted
145–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 146
Apr 23, 2025
D
Democratic60
98% Yea
R
Republican86
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Apr 24, 2025
Committee
Referred to Jurisprudence
upper
Apr 24, 2025
Introduced
Read first time
upper
Apr 23, 2025
Introduced
Received from the House
upper
Apr 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
Passed
lower
Apr 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
Passed to engrossment as amended
lower
Apr 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
Amended
lower
Apr 15, 2025
Lower · Passed
Committee report sent to Calendars
lower
Apr 14, 2025
Lower · Passed
Committee report distributed
lower
Apr 3, 2025
Lower · Passed
Reported favorably as substituted
lower
Apr 2, 2025
Lower · Passed
Left pending in committee
lower
Apr 2, 2025
Lower · Passed
Testimony taken/registration(s) recorded in committee
lower
Mar 14, 2025
Committee
Referred to Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
lower
Mar 14, 2025
Introduced
Read first time
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Sam Harless
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 2176
Scope: TX
Hi! I can help you understand HB 2176. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline