Photo of Tony Randolph
R South Dakota House · District 35

Rep. Tony Randolph

Compare
Total votes
2,187
all sessions
Attendance
96%
74 missed
Near the chamber average
With party
67%
of cast votes
Lower than 96% of chamber peers
Bipartisan score
18%
some cross-party votes
Higher than 94% of chamber peers
Sponsored
230
bills & resolutions
Near the chamber average
Committees
3
assignments
230 bills and resolutions

Sponsored bills

Total
230
Primary
230
Co-sponsor
0
This page
230
matching current filters
Primary HB 1320
Signed into law · South Dakota House · Lead sponsor
revise a provision related to service of process for boards of county commissioners.

Maddy summaryHB 1320 clarifies how legal documents must be served on county boards of commissioners in South Dakota. It revises two sections of state law: first, specifying that appeals against board decisions must be served on board members or affected parties (§7-8-29), and second, updating service rules to state that delivering documents to any county administrator, auditor, commissioner, executive, or registered agent of the county or board constitutes valid service (§15-6-4(d)(2)(i)). This change directly affects individuals filing appeals against county board decisions and legal professionals handling such cases. The bill streamlines the service process for county government entities without altering substantive legal rights.

Signed into law Mar 30, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 139
Signed into law · South Dakota Senate · Lead sponsor
revise a provision related to the transportation of an inmate upon discharge from a correctional facility.

Maddy summarySB 139 revises South Dakota law to clarify transportation requirements for inmates being discharged from correctional facilities. It requires correctional facilities to provide transportation to a location chosen by the inmate from three options: the county where the inmate lived at the time of the offense, the county where they received their sentence, or any location at the same distance as the closer of those two counties (based on mileage). This change gives inmates more flexibility in selecting a release location while ensuring transportation is provided to a reasonably accessible place near their previous residence or sentencing location. The bill directly affects inmates released from South Dakota correctional facilities under parole, suspended sentences, or final discharge.

Signed into law Mar 30, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 159
Signed into law · South Dakota Senate · Lead sponsor
revise requirements pertaining to the minimum age for marriage.

Maddy summarySB 159 raises South Dakota's minimum marriage age to 18, eliminating the previous exception allowing 16- to 17-year-olds to marry with parental consent. It requires court approval for any minor under 18 to marry, mandating an in-person hearing where the court assesses the minor's safety, maturity, and whether the marriage is voluntary, with written findings required. Alternatively, two parents' notarized consent (instead of one parent's) may be submitted, but the marriage license cannot be issued until 30 days after judicial approval. The bill also increases penalties for officiants who solemnize marriages without proper consent, classifying violations as a Class 1 misdemeanor. This directly affects minors aged 16-17 seeking marriage, their parents/guardians, and marriage officiants.

Signed into law Mar 30, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary HB 1077
Vetoed · South Dakota House · Lead sponsor
consider a cultivated-protein food product to be adulterated food.

Maddy summaryHB 1077 classifies cultivated-protein food products (lab-grown meat alternatives made from animal cells grown in vitro) as "adulterated food" under South Dakota's existing food safety laws. This bill directly affects producers and sellers of these products by automatically subjecting them to current adulteration penalties without requiring new safety standards. The key provision adds a specific definition in Section 39-4-2(8), stating such products are deemed adulterated regardless of their safety or labeling. The law does not create new regulations but applies existing food safety definitions to this emerging food category. This change would require cultivated-protein producers to comply with all current adulteration enforcement mechanisms.

Vetoed Mar 30, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary HB 1193
Signed into law · South Dakota House · Lead sponsor
modify the provisions for a refund of taxes to disabled veterans and surviving spouses under certain property tax relief programs.

Maddy summaryHB 1193 requires South Dakota counties to refund property taxes to disabled veterans and surviving spouses who qualify for tax exemptions under §§ 10-4-40 and 10-4-41 but missed application deadlines. The bill amends § 10-18-1 to explicitly allow refunds for the difference in taxes paid over the previous four years when eligibility requirements are otherwise met. This applies to veterans rated permanently and totally disabled from service-connected disabilities and their surviving spouses (including those receiving VA dependency compensation). The refund mechanism ensures counties must recalculate taxes and return overpayments when the only barrier was a missed deadline. It does not change eligibility criteria but adds a procedural remedy for administrative errors.

Signed into law Mar 30, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary SB 124
Signed into law · South Dakota Senate · Lead sponsor
temporarily prohibit the manufacture, sale, and distribution of any product containing cell-cultured protein, and to provide a penalty therefor.

Maddy summarySB 124 bans the manufacture, sale, and distribution of products containing cell-cultured protein in South Dakota from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2036. It directly affects food businesses, restaurants, and retailers selling such products, defining "cell-cultured protein" as any human food product grown from animal cells outside a live animal (excluding fermented foods, pharmaceuticals, and similar non-meat products). Violations are classified as Class 2 misdemeanors, with the state department authorized to inspect food establishments, issue stop-sale orders, and potentially suspend business licenses upon conviction. The law creates a 10-year temporary prohibition without specifying broader regulatory changes beyond this ban.

Signed into law Mar 12, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary HB 1322
Passed · South Dakota House · Lead sponsor
revise a provision related to the transportation of an inmate upon discharge from a correctional facility.

Maddy summaryHB 1322 revises a South Dakota law requiring correctional facilities to provide transportation for inmates when they are released (upon parole, sentence completion, or discharge). It mandates that facilities must provide transportation to one of three locations chosen by the inmate: the county where they lived before incarceration, the county where they were sentenced, or a location with equivalent mileage to the nearest of those two options. This change ensures inmates have a clear choice of destination while preventing facilities from routing them to unnecessarily distant locations. The bill does not alter existing requirements for providing inmates with clothing or a small cash allowance upon release. The policy directly affects all inmates leaving South Dakota correctional facilities.

Passed Feb 23, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary HB 1210
Failed · South Dakota House · Lead sponsor
prohibit COVID-19 vaccination requirements and to provide a penalty therefor.

Maddy summaryHB 1210 bans employers, schools, state agencies, and other entities from requiring COVID-19 vaccinations as a condition for employment, enrollment, or accessing services. It directly affects workers, students, and individuals seeking public benefits or services. Violating this ban would result in a Class 2 misdemeanor penalty. The law overrides existing requirements and takes effect immediately upon enactment.

Failed Feb 20, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary HB 1171
Failed · South Dakota House · Lead sponsor
establish provisions related to the disclosure of COVID-19 and mRNA vaccination status and blood donations.

Maddy summaryHB 1171 requires blood donation centers in South Dakota to ask donors if they've received a COVID-19 or mRNA vaccination and to label blood bags if they have. It prohibits disclosing the donor's personal information on the label. Patients needing non-emergency blood transfusions can request blood from donors with or without these vaccinations, and healthcare providers must provide that blood if available. The law directly affects blood donors, donation centers, and patients receiving transfusions, creating new disclosure and request mechanisms while banning discrimination based on vaccination status.

Failed Feb 17, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Primary HB 1211
Passed · South Dakota House · Lead sponsor
create a digital registry identification card for medical cannabis patients.

Maddy summaryHB 1211 creates a digital registry identification card for medical cannabis patients in South Dakota, replacing the current physical card. This digital card will be issued to qualifying patients and their designated caregivers who have received certification from a healthcare provider for a qualifying medical condition. The bill amends existing law to define "Cardholder" as someone possessing a valid digital registry card, which will be used to verify eligibility for medical cannabis use under state law. The change modernizes the verification process but does not alter the qualifying medical conditions or possession limits for patients.

Passed Feb 17, 2026 0 co-sponsors
Showing 1 to 10 of 230 bills
1 2 3 23 Next