revise certain requirements for contesting actions of the South Dakota Retirement System.
SB 51 revises the process for individuals to contest decisions made by the South Dakota Retirement System. It changes the deadline for requesting a contested case hearing from 30 days to 60 days after receiving a decision, requiring written requests sent by certified mail to specify the contested portion and the alleged factual or legal error. The bill also clarifies that requests postmarked within 60 days count as timely received, and failure to meet this deadline bars court review. This directly affects retirees or beneficiaries who disagree with Retirement System determinations about their benefits. The changes streamline the appeal timeline and documentation requirements without altering benefit eligibility or amounts.
Bill status
signed
all 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Feb 2026
Senate Passage
Feb 2026
Signed into Law
Feb 2026
Introduced Jan 13, 2026
Signed Feb 17, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced
→
Enrolled
·
3 edits
·
Feb 10, 2026
MINOR
This document is the final enrolled version of Senate Bill 51, which revises requirements for contesting actions by the South Dakota Retirement System. The text replaces the previous browser warning page with the complete, signed legislative act. The bill itself establishes a strict 60-day deadline for individuals to request a hearing if they disagree with an executive director's order, ensuring disputes are resolved quickly.
Scope change
The bill's scope is to revise the South Dakota Codified Laws section 3-12C-213 regarding the South Dakota Retirement System, but no substantive policy changes to the law's scope are visible in this text; it is the final version of an existing proposal.
TECHNICAL
Added the full text of the enrolled bill, including the title, enactment clause, and certification signatures, replacing the browser compatibility warning.
REQUIREMENT
Established a mandatory 60-day window from the date an order is mailed to request a contested case hearing, after which courts lose jurisdiction over the suit.
Clarified that if a hearing request is sent via US mail, the postmark date counts as the date received by the executive director.
Floor votes
How they voted
This bill passed the Senate by voice vote (no roll call recorded).
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
9
Committee
3
Feb 17, 2026
Signed into law
Signed by the Governor on 2026-02-17 S.J. 266
executive
Feb 11, 2026
Upper · Passed
Signed by the Speaker H.J. 300
upper
Feb 10, 2026
Upper · Passed
Signed by the President S.J. 236
upper
Feb 9, 2026
Upper · Passed
House of Representatives Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 65, NAYS 0 H.J. 262
upper
Feb 5, 2026
Upper · Passed
Certified uncontested, placed on consent , Passed, H.J. 1
upper
Feb 5, 2026
Upper · Passed
Retirement Laws Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 4, NAYS 0 H.J. 1
upper
Jan 26, 2026
Committee
Referred to House Retirement Laws H.J. 137
upper
Jan 22, 2026
Upper · Passed
Senate Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 34, NAYS 0 S.J. 83
upper
Jan 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
Certified uncontested, placed on consent , Passed, S.J. 1
upper
Jan 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
Retirement Laws Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 5, NAYS 0 S.J. 1
upper
Jan 13, 2026
Introduced
First read in Senate and referred to Senate Retirement Laws S.J. 14
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 51
Scope: SD
Hi! I can help you understand SB 51. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline