clarify bond or pre-trial release upon sobriety program participation.
HB 1176 clarifies that South Dakota courts may require defendants to participate in a 24/7 sobriety program as a condition of bond or pre-trial release. It prevents defendants from being jailed or having their release revoked solely due to inability to pay program costs, unless a court finds they could pay but willfully avoided doing so. Defendants must prove they didn’t willfully skip payments or made a genuine effort to pay. Unpaid program costs may later be added to a defendant’s sentence if the court determines they have the ability to pay. The bill directly affects individuals in criminal cases offered this program.
Bill status
passed both
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Mar 2026
House Passage
Feb 2026
Senate Failed
Mar 2026
Governor
Introduced Jan 28, 2026
Last action Mar 9, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced
→
Senate Appropriations Engrossed
·
3 edits
·
Mar 5, 2026
MINOR
This bill establishes a state fund to cover the costs of the 24/7 sobriety program and clarifies that defendants cannot be jailed or have their bonds revoked solely for failing to pay program fees. It requires courts to find that a defendant has the ability to pay before imposing unpaid costs on them after a case is concluded.
Scope change
The bill expands the scope by creating a dedicated state treasury fund to reimburse counties and cover program expenses, shifting the financial burden from local jurisdictions to the state.
FISCAL
Created a new state treasury fund called the '24/7 sobriety fund' to be administered by the Attorney General for program costs and county reimbursements.
ENFORCEMENT
Clarified that defendants cannot be jailed or have bonds revoked for non-payment unless the court determines they have the ability to pay.
REQUIREMENT
Added a requirement that unpaid program costs can only be imposed after a case disposition if the court finds the defendant has the ability to pay.
Floor votes · Senate Mar 9, 2026
How they voted
8–26
Failed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Mar 9, 2026
D
Democratic3
100% Yea
R
Republican32
81% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
6
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Mar 9, 2026
Upper · Passed
Placed on calendar pursuant to JR 6F-6 , Passed, YEAS 8, NAYS 26 S.J. 491
upper
Mar 5, 2026
Upper · Passed
Committee on Appropriations Report out of committee without recommendation as amended , Passed, YEAS 5, NAYS 4 S.J. 10
upper
Mar 5, 2026
Upper · Passed
Committee on Appropriations Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 4, NAYS 5 S.J. 10
upper
Mar 5, 2026
Introduced
Committee on Appropriations Motion to amend , Passed, S.J. 10 Amendment 1176B
upper
Mar 3, 2026
Committee
Referred to , Passed, Senate Committee on Appropriations YEAS 6, NAYS 1 S.J. 35
upper
Feb 11, 2026
Introduced
First read in Senate and referred to Senate Judiciary S.J. 248
upper
Feb 10, 2026
Lower · Passed
House of Representatives Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 66, NAYS 0 H.J. 279
lower
Feb 9, 2026
Lower · Passed
Certified uncontested, placed on consent , Passed, H.J. 19
lower
Feb 9, 2026
Lower · Passed
Judiciary Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 12, NAYS 0 H.J. 19
lower
Jan 28, 2026
Introduced
First read in House and referred to House Judiciary H.J. 164
lower
5 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Eric Emery
DDemocratic
P
Peri Pourier
RRepublican
P
Red Dawn Foster
DDemocratic
P
Tamara Grove
RRepublican
P
Tim Goodwin
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about HB 1176
Scope: SD
Hi! I can help you understand HB 1176. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline