amend provisions pertaining to the duties of presidential electors.
This bill modifies the responsibilities of presidential electors in South Dakota to clarify their duties during the electoral process. It directly affects individuals selected to vote for president and vice president on behalf of the state. The key provision adjusts the legal framework governing how these electors must cast their votes, ensuring compliance with federal election requirements. The changes aim to align state procedures with constitutional mandates for the Electoral College system.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Mar 2025
Senate Passage
Feb 2025
House Passage
Mar 2025
Governor
Introduced Feb 13, 2025
Last action Mar 3, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
Introduced
→
Senate Engrossed
·
4 edits
·
Feb 13, 2025
MODERATE
This bill amends South Dakota laws governing presidential electors to clarify when their office becomes vacant, how vacancies are filled, and establishes a requirement for electors to vote for the state's winning presidential candidates. The changes ensure that electors who refuse to vote or attempt to vote against the state's popular vote results will be removed from office.
Scope change
Expands the definition of elector vacancy to include refusal to vote or voting contrary to the state's popular vote results, and clarifies the process for filling vacancies.
REQUIREMENT
Added a new section stating that electors must vote for the presidential and vice presidential candidates who received the highest number of votes in the state's general election.
Added provisions making the office of presidential elector vacant if an elector refuses to vote or attempts to vote for a candidate other than the state's winning candidates.
Modified the vacancy filling process in Section 2 to clarify procedures for electing replacements when electors fail to appear, including specific roles for the Governor and secretary of state.
Modified Section 3 to clarify notification procedures for newly selected electors and their duties once they join the remaining electors.
Floor votes · Senate Feb 12, 2025
How they voted
33–2
Passed
Total votes 35
Feb 12, 2025
D
Democratic3
66% Nay
R
Republican32
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
6
Committee
4
Amendments
2
Mar 3, 2025
Lower · Passed
State Affairs Deferred to the 41st legislative day , Passed, YEAS 10, NAYS 2
lower
Mar 3, 2025
Lower · Passed
State Affairs Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 3, NAYS 9
lower
Mar 3, 2025
Introduced
State Affairs Motion to amend , Passed, YEAS 7, NAYS 5 Amendment 94B
lower
Feb 13, 2025
Introduced
First read in House and referred to H.J. 287
lower
Feb 12, 2025
Upper · Passed
Senate Do Pass Amended , Passed, YEAS 33, NAYS 2 S.J. 257
upper
Feb 12, 2025
Introduced
Senate Motion to amend , Passed, S.J. 256 Amendment 94A
upper
Feb 12, 2025
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-2)
senate
Feb 11, 2025
Upper · Passed
Senate Deferred to another day , Passed, S.J. 233
upper
Feb 10, 2025
Upper · Passed
State Affairs Do Pass , Passed, YEAS 8, NAYS 1
upper
Jan 29, 2025
Committee
Referred to S.J. 128
upper
4 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Amber Hulse
RRepublican
P
Jessica Bahmuller
RRepublican
P
Phil Jensen
RRepublican
P
Randy Deibert
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 94
Scope: SD
Hi! I can help you understand SB 94. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline